|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gianchicia www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gianchicia ![]() |
![]() | Panasonic FZ80 / FZ82 Pros: Compactness, battery life, quality at short focal lengths, MF, Gamma, stabilization, video quality Cons: IQ at more pushed focal lengths, noise over 400 ISO Opinion: After 3 months and 4000 photos, I can try to pull my sums. I took it on offer to be able to shoot after selling my 5300 to move to another, I could not be able to photograph. My expectations were consistent with the size of the sensor, but I must say that, in part, I was surprised: it is a handyman to always carry in the backpack, the short focal and in good condition of light the IQ is higher than expected, very sharp and full of details , almost at the height of much larger sensors, the range is good and allows more than some satisfaction. Increasing the focal length or shutting the diaphragm out all the limits of the system, but allows you to bring home very pleasant memories. Over 400 ISO too much noise; What saves some shots is a good maximum aperture of F/2.8. Technologically it is a surprise for the infinite possibility of adjustments and refinements, I also think too many for a newcomer, good the WB that however I customize, excellent burst; Really unexpected the operation of the stabilizer, a applaud to AF, immediate and that does not miss a shot, recognition faces, tracking, shutter speed, better than the 5300!!! Connectivity to the top, battery that allows up to 500 shots, viewfinder between sufficient and good, but full of info. The video quality is Panasonic, for me it should be bought even for videos. Unlike my initial intentions, I think I'll keep it when I buy better, take it around the neck, maybe at the beach and do not worry about having 2000 euros at risk, then with the 1200mm equivalent arrivals where ever you could with higher systems. Paradoxically for a superzoom what is, the true comfort are the 24mm focal length that are often a salvation. Certainly worth until the last euro that costs. sent on May 07, 2019 |
![]() | YI M1 Pros: Price, lightness, Sony sensor, plastic materials but well-assembled Cons: Range management, battery life Opinion: You can not expect to have camera body and two optics to less than three hundred euros and have everything that offer competitors at four times the price. Let's start here. I come from two media SLR cameras-good quality, I am not a professional, but having to active over 50k photos in recent years after studying from books and web, I can say that the M1 is a good machine to get us all at an amazing price. I miss the viewfinder, really much, lacks a true stabilization, the battery lasts 200 photos on average but the recharge as a smartphone, the sensor is a micro 4/3 Sony (which is enough to not add more on) the optics in the kit are sufficient to use it every Day, the 12-40 1:3.5-5.6 is the real handyman, not worse than the various 18-55 that give with other cameras, the 42.5 mm f:1.8 is, of course, brighter and suitable for portraits and landscapes, as well as having the macro function. This last fixed lens, which is also plasticous and light, seems to be of higher end for sharpness and overall quality of the shots, nothing miraculous but for me higher than the 12-40. What puts me in trouble is the dynamic range restricted, you have to work on it in post-production. The videos are more than good and the management to the 90% touch of the functions winks to those who are accustomed only to photos from the smartphone, not giving too much discomfort to those who already have experience. It's a mirrorless entry level to keep in your purse, you get the limits you can pull out something more than good at an unreachable price for others. With the FW 3.2 have solved the old problems of focus that is sufficient, but forget the readiness of a Sony. Finally, the ISO can be used up to 1600, besides it is better to devote to agriculture. sent on December 08, 2018 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me