RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

LorenzoPedrini
www.juzaphoto.com/p/LorenzoPedrini



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by LorenzoPedrini


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

apple_iphone11Apple iPhone 11

Pros: Shadow recovery, gamma, secondary chamber that does not lose quality

Cons: The third chamber that has the pro and if we really want the resolution

Opinion: It is really a great device from all points of view, from my perspective (unlike what I could say about the pro) also on the aspect of the price. After having "resisted" 1 year with the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (108mpx) I decided to switch, or rather, to return to Apple. But not so much for the SO, but just for the room. Despite the resolution of the Xiaomi was remarkable, the range and the return of colors in my opinion was really mediocre with the classic Samsung sensor colors "shot". There is a lot of difference here and for this I believe that the iPhone 11 is much higher, thus making the camera much more enjoyable despite the much lower resolution. I was really amazed by the product and the workability it has, especially in the recovery of shadows. As for the portraits it would perhaps have been almost better not to even have the mode, here the zoom camera that has the pro really makes a huge difference. One thing that in general I appreciate about Apple compared to other manufacturers is the fact that the rooms mounted on the devices are all of comparable quality to each other and usable 100%, since we are in a world where phones with 20 rooms are very fashionable, of which 3/4 are unusable for their really modest quality. ... a perfect cameraphone? This with even the third zoom camera of the pro version! Processor, screen and other components are very good about this, in order to contain the price, modestly the difference in the daily use they make is really little tangible having tried them both.

sent on August 25, 2021


nikon_d5100Nikon D5100

Pros: Orientation screen, return of colors and workability of raw file (sensor quality), current cost

Cons: AF points, slightly entry level commands, menus

Opinion: I have tried this camera on a few occasions just because the car is not mine, but my girlfriend's. I was mainly impressed by the workability and elasticity of the RAW file it produces and the colors you can pull out, especially considering the price at which you can find this camera currently. I haven't had the opportunity to try it in low light or long exposures yet, so I can't comment on the high ISO seal. At the level of AF, I think it pays a bit compared to some rivals of the time. To date I think it is a very good second body "battle", or a kind of "best-buy" for those who want to approach the world of photography with a fairly small budget considering the current price of the used because from satisfactions (and that's all that must do an entry level). I liked it.

sent on March 13, 2020


xiaomi_mi_note10Xiaomi Mi Note 10

Pros: Resolution, camera pro mode, screen quality, RAW format

Cons: Colors for those from Apple, jpeg images, processor

Opinion: I bought this smartphone because I was attracted to what it promised on paper at the camera level (for those occasions when you don't have a real camera in your hands) and because it's sick of the millions of euros required for the new iPhones. In my opinion this is not a smartphone "snaps and away", I explain better: with the camera in "normal" mode definitely makes good photos and absolutely well defined, but the quality of the color range is typical of Samsung sensors (I do not like it) and far from that Apple, and on several occasions the colors are a bit kneaded in my opinion (especially using secondary cameras). In short. a little below the expectations I had. In this way, however, in my opinion only 20% of the potential of this device is exploited, in "pro" mode it is possible to shoot in RAW format, taking advantage of the sensor definition qualities and post-production processing of the other parameters so you can adjust them in person. I know that the RAW file that it produces in my opinion is of excellent quality to be of a smartphone. Two lines also about the processor: for the use I do not create any limitation, but I realize that it does not live up to the remaining features of the smartphone and I think that a snapdragon of higher series could have brought even some improvements at the photographic level. Unfortunately I can answer at the moment difficulty to upload photos in 108Mpx here on Juza.

sent on March 13, 2020




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me