RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Jrvins
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Jrvins



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Jrvins


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

sony_a9Sony A9

Pros: Fps, stabilization, better buffer than Sony sisters, ISO, comfort of a "sporty", good EVF, AF-C

Cons: Buffer can still be improved, price -you worth it, ergonomics excellent but still better

Opinion: It is the car that marks the end of every Nikon DX shooting shot for sport use and that puts Canon in serious trouble with its 1D series. Almost always 20fps do not all serve, sometimes they are just a burden, but take a training athlete in absolute silence at that speed, it has no price. It is also great to have the viewfinder not obscured at the time of shooting, to make the composition always "under the eye". Aesthetically similar to the sisters even though the substantial differences are in the controls that are now physical and no longer electronic: see the holes for choosing the autofocus or the shutter speed; Or the joystick to choose the MAF point - even if I did not find it very comfortable. I did not find any overheating problems and the battery covered 700 shots, in no extreme situations. With the latest generation Lexar, the buffer download time is much faster than the Sony sisters, but nothing to do with the Canon ones. All in all, transeat.rnThere are few improvementsThere is a body that gives you the impression of being firmer, it would not drift ... but it would not be Sony at that point.

sent on June 23, 2017


nikon_105vr_microNikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8 G ED VR Micro

Pros: Construction, 2.8, VR, Sharpness, Blurry, Macro

Cons: slow and ruomoroso AF, to tame

Opinion: I had it in the car four days for a couple of sets of portrait and I was able to squeeze us fondo.rnNiente different than what was said by those before me, but I would say more that the AF and VR are slow rumorosi.rnPer portraiture and the use that I made, it was not easy to use, even at 2.8, with good sharpness, the pdc is very narrow: focusing on the breast, for example, the eyes already appear less sharp. rnDirei which is not a lens for those who are the first armi.rn

sent on February 12, 2017




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me