|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
MarkLazzo www.juzaphoto.com/p/MarkLazzo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Focal, Sharpness, Price, Flare, Weight, Constant Opening Cons: Bulky hood Opinion: My first lens L. Taken for 40d with the intention of switching to FF as soon as possible, it was already far from the 17-85 level I had. Impeccable construction, tropicalization, smoothness of the rings .. another planet in short, and above all for image quality. Once it went to 5d2 it was love, covering wide-angle and standard focuses, sharpness (already notable on the 10MP of the 40d) enhanced by the larger sensor but also denser and more powerful. It's the lens for definite landscapes, a price-quality ratio I think is incomparable. 17mm distortion is so accentuated but soluble with a click, minimal color aberrations, monstrous flare resistance. I only saw flares using a ND1000 Haida and pointing directly against the sun. Angle sharpness is more than acceptable to TA, and improves when closed at more than one stop (perfect from f / 8 af / 11), resulting in a qualityserious; Of excellent angle angle image. Towards the 40mm, it loses a touch of sharpness across the entire frame, but to really notice it you have to compare the images close to each other. The only counter is the size of the hood, which doubled (or nearly) the diameter of the optic, and forced to sacrifice a lot of space in the backpack and makes a nightmare the decision of what optics to bring if you want to get out of the light and like me , It is considered indispensable. However at 17mm the field angle is wide and if you want the hood that is the compromise to accept, so I do not consider it a significant counter. My concluding opinion is that, given the price, is the best wide-angle zoom in circulation. sent on July 15, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Pros: Focal, Weight, Price Cons: Sharpness, Darkness, AF (Considered Alternative) Opinion: Honestly, I never really came into the world of canvases. With my first reflex, the 1000d, the 18-55 kit I always seemed to be short, often looking for portraits and close close plans, so I was able to give this cheap and lightweight piece with which I played a bit, at the beginning Stunned by the focal length, enthusiastic about the fact that I could take details of long distance, close-ups without moving, simply turning the ring. All this from a novice in experimentation. However the benefits are all there when it's your first canvass and you're under the 300mm wow effect on apsc. After doing a little bit of experience you realize the limits of the optics, which, for charity, makes it discreetly, but without stabilization it is realistically usable only in good light conditions or under 150mm. Observe the sports at the closed or high speeds unless under the direct sunshine. After 40d I inherited an old 70-210 f / 4 and I have not used it anymore. I would love to say it is a'Optic for those who are at the beginning and is experimenting with new things, looking for their place in the world of photography, if not by the fact that with a few extra euros you get an ultrasound AF faster and more powerful. In my opinion, it does not make much sense as an optician and I can not recommend it considering the alternative almost at the same price (and I talk about who CAN LOVE and VUOLE the new one). If you are interested, I can say that it would be worth it only if you are under 20 years old and has been given, for those who have more experience there are a tide (literally) of alternatives (from old canon versions to more recent third-party optics ) That work much better. sent on July 15, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Pros: Focal Point, AF Speed, Stabilization Cons: Sharpness, AF, AC. (Diaphragm cable) Opinion: The lens I used most on apsc (40d) is undoubtedly comfortable, a definitely better handset than the unbeaten 18-55 had with the 1000d but I was never satisfied with the yield. Slightly resolving already on the 10MP of the 40d (which was in the kit), I can only imagine the yield on denser sensors. Dark, not so much as self-opening (after all they are compromised with the focal excursion) as much as light collected, 2/3 of the stop less, which in some cases make the difference. The distortion is only visible at 17mm, correctable in post and predictable so no account as a counter, even as already between 20 and 24mm disappears. Another story is the color aberrations, evident and not always correctable via software. Stabilization is effective and useful in some cases, especially at long focal lengths. Autofocus is fast and silent but works well only in good light conditions, but becomes terribly inaccurate as it passes in the shadows and unfortunately alsoHitting it by selecting the center point and looking for the highest contrast points is not always effective, preventing the click and continuing to move the fire back and forth trying to confirm. I have never had any problems with the diaphragm cable, but given the amount of users who have had such a problem, I can only cite it. It is a lens with which it is more than ever the photographer that the optician to pull out good shots and seeing the price he is using is definitely a beneficial purchase in certain respects if you need those millimeters more than To standard 18-55 on a low-density sensor without high expectations. For the rest, I do not feel comfortable with it, considering the valid alternatives for both Canon and third-party phones. sent on July 15, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Sharpness, Price Cons: Materials, Defocused Opinion: I have had this lens for years and used on entry-level body (1000d), semipro (40d) and FF (5d2), never disappointed. It certainly has its negative aspects, it's a plastic after all, and blur it's a little tough, but I'm challenging to find an optic that has yielded this little bit to the priceless price it's sold. Sharpness is devastating, af is slow and noisy, but it works and is accurate. It is mounted on any sensor. I'm not a 50mm lover on FF, so I sold it but I consider it a must-have for those who are developing passion for photography without spending capital and those on apsc are interested in portraiture.rnrnNote: despite plastic ( Honestly they could have built at least the metal attack), like all the objects, if it's a tough one. The use of manual fire is quite unmanageable for the unhappy focus ring position. RnrnConclusion: you can find many defects in the outside, atThe feeling of fragility that the materials give, the performance of the AF .. but also taken together, the defects are swept away by the incredible optical yield, compactness, weight and especially glass price of undoubted quality. sent on July 15, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
