RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Agatensi
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Agatensi



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Agatensi


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

viltrox_af56_f1-4Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.4

Pros: Yield at 1.4, maybe price, construction.

Cons: Speed af (at least on my Sony a6300), aperture ring not braked.

Opinion: Taken because it corresponds to a focal length congenial to me (85mm equivalent), it shows sharp files already at 1.4. Obviously closing they improve even more, and then "collapse" from f8 upwards. Built well, it weighs the right and is well balanced. I was not convinced by the autofocus (af eye not very usable on moving subjects) in general and the diaphragm ring not braked. Leaving it in A it often happens that it moves, thus shooting at f16. It is always to be controlled, much better without and diaphragm control from camera body. In short, a lens that makes its own, but if you look at the used with little more you take the Sigma 56 1.4, lens in my opinion more valid.

sent on August 23, 2022


canon_70-300is_usm_iiCanon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM II

Pros: Focus speed (ideal with 6D). Optical quality from L-series at least up to 200mm. Design. "Right" size and weight. Effective stabilizer.

Cons: The f4 is only at 70mm, already at 72 it becomes f4.5.

Opinion: In combination with the 6D gives a crazy speed of focus (considering the autofocus of the 6D), the optical quality is from L series, I tested it compared to a 70 200 f4 L and the photos, with 100% magnification, did not disfigure, indeed sometimes they were better. without considering the plus of the stabilizer (the test was done on easel and is disabled). Obviously I don't have a comparison meter from 200 to 300, but the loss of detail at maximum focal is not obvious. Finally the stabilizer is really effective, it really comes close to the 4 stops promised. In short, an optic with excellent price/performance ratio!!

sent on September 12, 2019


samsung_s8Samsung S8

Pros: Screen, size (in relation to screen), camera, speed, aesthetics, water resistance.

Cons: Cost, it does not have to fall !!

Opinion: Purchased to replace an S4, the first thing that amazes is the display. After a few days of use, other cell phones seem prehistoric. Great and definite, in a phone that is handled comfortably with one hand (like or better than S4). Other benefits are the operational speed, design and overall quality sensation that is perceived in all areas. Do not evaluate biometric sensors and iris or face recognition because I do not use them. The camera is fundamentally the same as the S7 with some extra function, so one of the best on the market. And in fact considering the size of the sensor comes to shout at the miracle, of course you can not claim the quality of a full frame, but if the purpose of web publishing is fine. Needless to me, the raw shot (but I'm going to do more tests) since the jpg bake is already very optimized, the feeling is that the margin of improvement by developing the raw is reduced, the Samsung processing software well knowshow to get the most from the small sensor. Moving to the negative notes the first is the price, it's impossible to get a list (829 €) online, it's easy to get 600 €, though many, too many in my opinion. I took advantage of a Wind promo and paid it 399 diluted in 30 months (99 euros now more than 10 per month for 30 months). But the worst aspect is the difficulty of protecting this type of screen from shocks, it seems that you have to choose whether to have a protective cover or a glass film in the front, at the moment I did not find an effective and compatible cover / film combination, which makes it vulnerable in case of drops and the price to pay for a new screen is high.rnAdjustment: Confirm the initial impression, eye to the screen fragility, it's amazing! My crippled has never fallen to have bumped, just in my pocket !! They told me that maybe they were the keys of the machine in the same pocket in the jeans .. ok, it may be, and usually the stanceor careful but in normal use can happen once, cabbage! Precisely that mine is equipped with rugged cover and outfitters film (you can not put that in glass with protective covers).

sent on July 26, 2017




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me