RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Artistic Nude
  4. » Portfolio - Nude

 



ATTENTION! This gallery shows artistic nude photos, included full frontal nude, both male and female. DO NOT visit this gallery if:

1) You don't are at least 18 years old.

2) You get easily annoyed by nude photos (the definition of 'artistic nude' is rather subjective, so some photos may be unpleasing).

3) Do not visit this section if you want to see only good photos: as for every gallery, the quality of the photos goes from excellent to very bad.



If you are over 18 and you want to see these photos, click here.


To save your preference, join JuzaPhoto!



Portfolio - Nude

View gallery (20 photos)



Attention: the definition of 'artistic nude' is very subjective and some photos may look inappropriate.

If you don't want to see the photos or this user, click here: ignore this user


PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on July 27, 2014 (19:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

great job for a physical way, beautiful shot in B / W

avatarjunior
sent on July 27, 2014 (22:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

very nice b / w; perhaps a reflector positioned to the right to fill the eye would have been ideal.
compliments

avatarjunior
sent on July 27, 2014 (23:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Grx x passing comments exi ... No, but tell me about any of it buchineri of reflective panels of Obre it too hard ... ;)

avatarsenior
sent on July 28, 2014 (8:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The eye is in total darkness and this is a big mistake for a portrait.
Good rest. Hello.

avatarsenior
sent on July 28, 2014 (9:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

JosePhoto is clear that the strong contrast is desired and it is a choice that I share too, but actually it's a shame you can not see the second eye, but not for a formal question, but just because expression of the model so harsh in my opinion would make it even more

avatarjunior
sent on July 28, 2014 (9:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

congratulations, see shots so ';-) ;-) ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on July 28, 2014 (10:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Then there was a picture ... but I would agree that nn and therefore no error in my opinion. Then when it comes to advice then the question changes. No, but tell me about the technicalities ... please!

avatarsenior
sent on July 28, 2014 (10:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'm not talking about technicalities, I know that you've got the technique.
I just think it's a shame that that eye shadow is so hard because expression is beautiful all here.
Then maybe I'm wrong, and you put yourself perdevan panel contrasts so strong and lost in "aggression" ...

avatarjunior
sent on July 28, 2014 (10:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like the choice of the look "mysterious" .... good texture.

avatarsenior
sent on July 28, 2014 (11:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Had a picture then I would agree ... but that nn and therefore no error in my opinion.

I were you I'd be a little more humble and would accept some criticism.
if it is a portrait of what is it?

This is a classic half-length. photo only appears in a soggeto and light emphasizes the features of a muscular physique. the lack of visualization of the eye is an illumination error. Then you want to be an artist (photography is art because it already) then you do not get the freedom to see the eye and say that this is not a portrait ...
that's fine.

No, but tell me about technicalities please!

with all due respect, I think I can permettere to give a technical opinion.

a greeting. ;-)


avatarjunior
sent on July 28, 2014 (11:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Donato with all due respect nn think you can give me technical advice about an artistic nude of this entity ....
We all know the rules, or nearly so, but every so often I like to avoid them ....
I say it's a good portrait ... is not one of your pictures in all light, then what are we talking about?
you commented just to say "I know how to do portraits and you do not" ... here who is guilty of humility nn I know ;)
Error lighting .... uhm but you've seen the whole series or not?
I get the impression that it is easier to shoot comments without even go and ask the perk ... but you've written several times that it is a mistake to not display the eye, but where is it written? who decided that in a nude art where the only source of light was given by a commercial white light (a wolf dlight 800W) mounted on a Manfrotto giraffe I should perforza to see the eyes?
I decided to see another eye ... I did not care much ... you tell me that is a personal choice and there is, but I repeat, nn talk to me about any of the technicalities of it rules .... especially on the bare artistic!

avatarsenior
sent on July 28, 2014 (11:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I have expressed an opinion on lighting and not on naked ;-)
still okay, if this is your idea ...
I close by saying that just did not want to be presumptuous, I apologize if I have been, it is not in my nature.
a greeting ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on July 28, 2014 (12:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Donato ... the lighting is linked to the kind of snap proposed ... so yeah, you gave an opinion on lighting and therefore the nude.

Have a nice day

avatarsenior
sent on July 28, 2014 (12:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I also do shots at a Hefty next Thursday. I hope to give me a release for publication .... in fact not always what you shoot is accompanied by release ...
I hope that you can then give it a pass.
Good Day to you too.

avatarjunior
sent on July 28, 2014 (12:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

look and see ;)

avatarsenior
sent on July 28, 2014 (12:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I do not like neither portraits nor naked, but I have to say that this photo has a big impact, visual and emotional.
The light would not say it is wrong, the fact that the eyes are in the shade has a lovely atmosphere hard.
Not the usual, thankfully I might add, portrait-naked woman sparaflashato, iperilluminato.
It 's all in all a good-looking light emotions.
What about getting all perfect, but all to some extent we have to always improve.
I like it.
Hello
LC

avatarmoderator
sent on July 28, 2014 (14:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like the composition and the subject drowned in the black background. I agree with those who preceded me on a very light illumination on both eyes that have already hinted at a three-dimensionality and a sufficient reading of the details (look in the room). (Imho). hello, laurel

avatarjunior
sent on July 28, 2014 (16:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Moth we have already clarified with donated ... nn do the devil's advocate and come back to stay goodie: D

avataradmin
sent on July 28, 2014 (17:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Jose, this is a forum to receive comments and recommendations on the photos, they must be accepted so the positive comments as negative ones, when expressed with education (as did many who were present).

Overall I like the photo, but like many others I too would have preferred more open shadows: I understand that it is a deliberate choice, but you also have to understand that it can not necessarily be shared by all :-)

avatarjunior
sent on July 28, 2014 (17:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Of course: D
Everyone has his thoughts .... I express my: D


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me