What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 27, 2014 (12:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This picture I find it really, but really Gorgeous!!
If photographing a blackbird on a piece of wood in your garden, you would have got 50 comments, while a "trivial Flamingo" portrait in flight, panning, with a time of perfect shot, so not only from the creative point of view but also technical, not comments it receives, it visits ...... This forum is becoming a sadness!! Sorry if I'm allowed.
Congratulations also to the entire series.
Hello Mark. Questa foto la trovo Veramente, ma Veramente Splendida!!!!
Se fotografavi un merlo su un legnetto nel tuo giardino, avresti preso 50 commenti, mentre per un "banale Fenicottero" ritratto in volo, in panning, con un tempo di scatto perfetto, quindi non solo dal punto di vista creativo ma anche tecnico, non riceve ne commenti, ne visite...... Questo forum sta diventando una tristezza!!!! Scusa se mi sono permesso.
Complimenti anche per l'intera serie.
Ciao Marco. |
| sent on July 27, 2014 (18:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Mark Mercuri! I'm glad you caught, it was a workshop on the panning in the Camargue ... this photo for me was the icing on the cake ;-):-D Grazie Marco Mercuri! Sono contento che tu abbia colto, era un workshop sul panning in Camargue... questa foto per me è stata la ciliegina sulla torta ;-) |
| sent on July 27, 2014 (18:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ for a while "trivial Flamingo" portrait in flight, panning, „
Excuse me for a moment ... but for panning is not enough to have the strips with almost anything in focus. Excuse me if I would, but this is by no means a panning. The photo deserve as well, but it seems really excessive to define panning. " mentre per un "banale Fenicottero" ritratto in volo, in panning,"
Scusami un attimo...ma per il panning non basta avere le strisciate con quasi niente a fuoco. Scusami se mi permetto, ma questo non è per niente un panning. La foto meriterà pure, ma definirla panning mi sembra veramente eccessivo. |
| sent on July 27, 2014 (20:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact, I do not think the classic panning, or at least in the background we, here in this case the subject accompanies the movement, but I like
hello
joseph infatti non mi sembra il classico panning, o per lo meno sullo sfondo ci siamo ,qui in questo caso il soggetto accompagna il movimento, però mi piace
ciao
giuseppe |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
