What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 25, 2014 (17:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Honestly x beast that you find yourself expecting much better .... I see soft:-P:-P Sinceramente x la bestia che ti ritrovi mi aspettavo molto meglio....la vedo morbida |
| sent on July 25, 2014 (17:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
really nice davvero bella |
| sent on July 25, 2014 (17:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would say that given the poor light conditions and the multiplier is not bad at all! Io direi che dato le scarse condizioni di luce e il moltiplicatore non è affatto male! |
| sent on July 25, 2014 (18:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Gary, seeing the smiley faces in your comment I do not know if it was ironic .. but to tell the truth it seemed to me a bit 'soft that's why I wanted to hear the comments, of course taking into account the low lighting conditions and the fact I rode that the 2x ... I also exceptional 400l f5.6 (light, unsurpassed in against light), but in these conditions I would never be able to achieve this result. Ciao Gaetano, vedendo le faccine nel tuo commento non so se era ironico.. ma a dire la verità sembrava anche a me un po' morbida è per questo che volevo sentire dei commenti, naturalmente tenendo conto anche delle scarse condizioni di luminosità e del fatto che montavo il 2x... ho anche l'eccezionale 400l f5.6(leggero, insuperabile nel contro luce) ma in queste condizioni non sarei mai riuscito ad ottenere questo risultato. |
| sent on July 25, 2014 (18:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful ;-) Bella |
| sent on July 25, 2014 (19:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bella. Bella. |
| sent on July 25, 2014 (20:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great photo ;-) Ottima foto |
| sent on July 26, 2014 (11:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful crown! Bella coroncina! |
| sent on July 26, 2014 (22:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I believe that the head is moved, perhaps moved the sgarza io credo che la testa sia mossa, forse si è mossa la sgarza |
| sent on July 27, 2014 (21:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Nicholas, Thank you for viewing, but do not think it's moved because with an exposure of 1/2000, you can lock the wings of a hummingbird, I think it's rather a slight blur. Thanks for the ride Henry, Louis, John, Matthew, Francis and Nicholas. Ciao Nicola, grazie per l'osservazione, ma non credo si tratti di mosso anche perché con una esposizione di 1/2000 potresti bloccare le ali ad un colibrì, credo si tratti piuttosto di un leggero sfocato. Grazie per il passaggio Enrico, Luigi, Giovanni, Matteo, Francesco e Nicola. |
| sent on October 26, 2014 (10:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Superb. Stupenda. |
| sent on November 03, 2014 (0:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks Luke passage, good light grazie Luca del passaggio, buona luce |
| sent on February 22, 2015 (19:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Let's say that, on balance, the shot can go. Obviously the low light and high ISO flatten the image, make it a little soft in fact. Diciamo che, tutto sommato, lo scatto può andare. Ovviamente la scarsa luce e gli Iso alti appiattiscono l'immagine, la fanno un pochino morbida insomma. |
| sent on February 23, 2015 (10:36)
Very very nice |
| sent on February 23, 2015 (15:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not that depends on a bad pp or little contrast medium? I assure you that the 400 2.8 can not be soft even with the 2x, hello and congratulations for the subject and shooting Non è che dipende da una cattiva pp o da poca mdc? Vi assicuro che il 400 2,8 non può essere morbido neanche con il 2x, ciao e complimenti per il soggetto e lo scatto |
| sent on February 23, 2015 (16:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ITA Ottimo scatto |
| sent on March 09, 2015 (16:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thank you all for the comments 8-) grazie a tutti per i commenti |
| sent on April 20, 2016 (14:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, if you took to 1/2000 with 1250 f5.6 light there was, and a lot. For low light I mean areas where you shoot at ISO 1600, f2.8 and at speeds between 1/250 and 1/400 (eg. Slovenian forests). However the quality of the image (which is not good) I think is due to the fact that the whole system is "pulled": aps-c sensor for medium to high iso + duplicated lens (although it is excellent 400 2.8 IS) probably not allow you to do more. Hello Alexander Ciao, se hai scattato a 1/2000 con 1250 e f5.6 di luce ce n'era, e parecchia. Per poca luce io intendo zone in cui si scatta a 1600 iso, f2.8 e tempi compresi tra 1/250 e 1/400 (es. boschi sloveni). Comunque la qualità dell'immagine (che non è buona) secondo me è dovuta al fatto che tutto il sistema è "tirato": sensore aps-c ad iso medio-alti + lente duplicata (seppur si tratti dell'ottimo 400 2.8 IS) non permettono probabilmente di fare di più. Ciao Alessandro |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |