What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 22, 2014 (12:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
in my view, very nice and beautiful colors of the plumage. hello Pier a mio avviso molto bella e belle le cromie del piumaggio. ciao Pier |
| sent on July 22, 2014 (14:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree, the first thing I said was, the horrible blurry :/ But the beautiful colors of the bird compensate ;-)
IMHO with an f/3.5 or even 2.8 at the expense of sharpness you'd have a better background. Concordo, la prima cosa che ho detto è stata: orribile lo sfocato :/ Ma i bellissimi colori dell'uccello compensano IMHO con un f/3.5 o anche 2.8 a scapito della nitidezza avresti avuto uno sfondo migliore. |
| sent on July 22, 2014 (17:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Pier, glad you like it ;-) hello, G.Piero Grazie mille Pier, ben contento che ti piaccia ciao, G.Piero |
| sent on July 22, 2014 (18:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Conte17 of the passage. In hindsight I agree with you: I would have gladly open at 1.4 - At the "professional" I got him less than two meters, but fearing that stood out the flight I did not think their all, because more than 1/4000, the reflex it crashed:-D ;-) and I have not risked. - But so I know where it is "direct" the "traveler" and sooner or later, the ribecco:-D Thanks again, a greeting, G.Piero Grazie Conte17 del passaggio. Col senno di poi concordo con te: Avrei volentieri aperto anche a 1.4 - Al "professionista" gli sono arrivato a meno di due metri, ma temendo che spiccasse il volo non le ho pensate proprio tutte, anche perché oltre 1/4000, la reflex si impalla e non ho rischiato. - Ma tanto lo so dove fa "scalo" il "viaggiatore" e prima o poi, lo ribecco Grazie di nuovo, un saluto, G.Piero |
| sent on July 22, 2014 (18:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Thanks Conte17 of the passage. In hindsight I agree with you: I would have gladly open at 1.4 - At the "professional" I got him less than two meters, but fearing that stood out the flight I did not think their all, because more than 1/4000, the reflex impallaMrGreen you ;-) and I have not risked. - But so I know where it is "direct" the "traveler" and sooner or later, the ribeccoMrGreen Thanks again, a greeting, G.Piero „
I'm glad that we share the same thought ;) Ps: 500D, great car:-D " Grazie Conte17 del passaggio. Col senno di poi concordo con te: Avrei volentieri aperto anche a 1.4 - Al "professionista" gli sono arrivato a meno di due metri, ma temendo che spiccasse il volo non le ho pensate proprio tutte, anche perché oltre 1/4000, la reflex si impallaMrGreen;-) e non ho rischiato. - Ma tanto lo so dove fa "scalo" il "viaggiatore" e prima o poi, lo ribeccoMrGreen Grazie di nuovo, un saluto, G.Piero" Sono contento che condividiamo lo stesso pensiero ;) P.s.: 500D, grande macchina |
| sent on July 22, 2014 (18:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ : 500D, great car „ It gets better, but if you start to "chase" the Jap six ruined:-D:-D ;-) " : 500D, grande macchina" C'è di meglio, ma se ti metti a "rincorrere" i Jap sei rovinato |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |