What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user11529 | sent on July 19, 2014 (21:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great still images with impressive clarity, not easy to do, congratulations ... hello PierGiorgio Ottimo fermo immagine con nitidezza impressionante,non facile da fare,complimenti...ciao PierGiorgio |
| sent on July 19, 2014 (22:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Piergiorgio. Put your finger on it because if I do I almost always known for stationary subjects always get the maximum sharpness. Why the movement even if you use a very short time and always steals something retail, especially in the magnification comes out (another story if you show it on FB 800 px). In this case, then it is very difficult to keep the focus on the subject that moves too close to the background and present. The AF goes in search of the greatest contrast is in the background and with continuous AF and all the sensors alerted (51) is really a lottery. I tried with only one sensor active and this time I succeeded quite well. Grazie Piergiorgio. Metti il dito nella piaga perche se noti io faccio quasi sempre soggetti fermi per ottenere sempre il massimo di nitidezza. Perchè il movimento anche se usi tempi brevissimi ruba sempre qualcosa al dettaglio e , specie negli ingrandimenti, viene fuori (altro discorso se la fai vedere su FB a 800 px). In questo caso poi è difficilissimo tenere il fuoco sul soggetto che si sposta per lo sfondo troppo vicino e presente. L'AF va a cercare il maggior contrasto che trova nello sfondo e con AF continuo e tutti i sensori allertati (51) è veramente un terno al lotto. Io ho provato con un sensore solo attivo e questa volta ci sono riuscito abbastanza bene. |
| sent on July 20, 2014 (12:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot, beautiful image ... congratulations Grande scatto, bellissima immagine...complimenti |
| sent on July 23, 2014 (19:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Louis Grazie Luigi |
| sent on July 23, 2014 (20:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you too Luigi Pallotta Grazie anche a te Pallotta Luigi |
| sent on July 23, 2014 (20:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations ;-) ;-) Complimenti |
| sent on July 23, 2014 (20:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Amazing that a 1/4000 there is still moved! A splendid shooting on the fly, one of the best ;-), with a nice compo and sharpness to the top! Well done indeed!
Riki Incredibile che a 1/4000 ci sia ancora del mosso! Uno splendido scatto al volo, uno dei migliori , con una bella compo e nitidezza al top! Complimenti davvero! Riki |
| sent on July 23, 2014 (21:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Superb ... great shot on the fly ... Stupenda...ottimo scatto al volo... |
| sent on July 24, 2014 (11:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful shot and great reflexes. bellissimo scatto e grandi riflessi. |
| sent on July 24, 2014 (14:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot, not easy ... so many compliments. Ottimo scatto, non facile...tanti complimenti. |
| sent on July 25, 2014 (9:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Henry Riki: is the 'wing at the top does not look quite firm and I think it should be good to lock at least 1/5000 ° for birds. Thank you so much for your welcome comment! Gaetano: Thank you very much Antonio: Many Thanks Richard: Thank you very much Grazie Enrico Riki: si l' ala al vertice non sembra perfettamente ferma e secondo me per bloccare bene occorre almeno 1/5000° per gli uccelli. Grazie davvero per il tuo gradito commento! Gaetano: Grazie mille Antonio: Grazie Tante Riccardo: Grazie mille |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |