JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on July 10, 2014 (21:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The overall picture does not convince me for these reasons: Move- Maf-delayed uncertain Digital-to-noise surfacing due to strong crop and / or post-production Tips: Do not exceed a crop of about 50% in order not to degrade the quality Sigma 120-400mm has about comportamenbto 150-500mm os even if the latter so I think clearer. Sigma 120-400mm to 400mm os makes it better by closing at least f.8. To the point of maf recommend using a single point of f and-servant For the shake-always apply the simple rules of the reciprocal of the focal length .. 400mm on aps-C then you need to seek at least a shutter speed of 1/400 sec. (Considering the weight of the optics and the presence of the stabilizer). Hello, laurel L'immagine nel complesso non mi convince per questi motivi: -mossa -maf incerta posticipata -rumore digitale affiorante causa forte crop e/o post produzione Consigli: Non superare un crop del 50% c.a. per non peggiorare la qualità Il sigma 120-400mm ha circa il comportamenbto del 150-500mm os anche se quest'ultimo lo ritengo più nitido . Il sigma 120-400mm os rende meglio a 400mm chiudendo almeno a f.8 . Per il punto di maf consiglio di usare un solo punto di af e ai-servo Per il micromosso applica sempre la regoletta del reciproco della focale .. su aps-C a 400mm ti basterebbe ricercare almeno un tempo di scatto di 1/400 sec. (considerando il peso dell'ottica e la presenza del stabilizzatore) . Ciao, lauro
sent on July 10, 2014 (22:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I can not make small sizes, I have some problem with the PC. in the "archives" are not like that, I do not understand why worsens cualita dell'imaggine, such as public :-( non riesco a fare i formati piccoli,ho qualche problema col pc. nel"archivio" non sono cosi,non capisco perche peggiora la cualita dell'imaggine,come le pubblico :-(
sent on July 10, 2014 (23:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The same problems will also be reflected in the version 6.3 megapixel camera that you posted :-| Gli stessi problemi li riscontro anche nella versione da 6,3 megapixel che hai postato
sent on July 11, 2014 (18:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find it hard to load, and it takes time to post them, I do not know if it depends on the site or if my pc :-( will make you look like in fb photos that are not public so grammme :-( emilio nicola will call me pleasure :-) faccio molta fatica a caricarle,e ci mette tanto a postarle,non so se dipende dal sito o il mio pc:-( se ti fara piacere guarda in fb le foto che pubblico non sono cosi grammme :-( emilio di nicola,mi fara piacere :-)
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
