JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on May 18, 2014 (20:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Missing the shooting data for a more detailed analysis. It would seem that given the proximity of the pdc was too narrow helped by the aperture value that you set. The maf is anticipated on the nose not affecting the nodal point which is the eye. Good detail and colors. Too bad for the lower cut. (Imho). hello, laurel. Edit: uses in these cases a single point of f and f-continuous ;-) Mancano i dati di scatto per una più approfondita analisi. Sembrerebbe che data la vicinanza la pdc fosse troppo ristretta aiutata anche dal valore del diaframma da te impostato. La maf è anticipata sul nasino non interessando il punto nodale che è l'occhio . Buoni il dettaglio e le cromie. Peccato per il taglio inferiore. (imho) . ciao, lauro. Edit: usa in questi casi un solo punto di af e af-continuo
sent on May 20, 2014 (21:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Lauro your advice .. you are very well prepared .... but I am a retiree from time lover of photography ... but unfortunately I am as a musician who plays by ear and does not know the music. But I want to learn (it is never too late) ... I can recommend a site to go to read and understand all these acronyms (pdc, PP, maf, colors, imho etc.etc.).
A hug Silvano Grazie Lauro dei tuoi consigli..sei molto preparato....io invece sono un pensionato da sempre amante della fotografia...ma ahimè sono come un musicista che suona ad orecchio e non conosce la musica. Ho però voglia di imparare (non è mai troppo tardi)...mi puoi consigliare un sito dove andare a leggere e capire tutte queste sigle (pdc, pp, maf,cromie, imho ecc.ecc.).
sent on May 20, 2014 (22:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
pdc = depth of field (the area clear) pp = post production (the workflow that performs in the preparation of the image to your computer) maf = point-focus (where you are targeted) colors = colors IMHO = is an acronym for "in my humble / humble opinion"
Search for these two specials: Abc-digital photography publishing Cesco Ciapanna Publisher copyright Simon Joinson 16euro Digital SLR photography-publishing author Will Cheung Publisher Cesco Ciapanna 16euro
8-) p.d.c. = profondità di campo (la zona nitida) p.p. = post produzione (il flusso di lavoro che esegui nella preparazione dell'immagine al computer) m.a.f. = punto di messa fuoco (dove hai mirato) cromie = colori I.m.h.o = è un acronimo "secondo la mia modesta/umile opinione"
Cerca questi due speciali: -abc fotografia digitale editrice Cesco Ciapanna Editore autore Simon Joinson 16euro -fotografia digitale reflex editrice Cesco Ciapanna Editore autore Will Cheung 16euro