What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 18, 2014 (18:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The nice colors and composition. For my taste the falling lines are excessive. We urgently need a sensor cleaning if you do not see the oxen in the sky of the effects of anti-type 8-). (Imho). hello, laurel Piacevoli le cromie e la composizione. Per i miei gusti le linee cadenti sono eccessive . Urge una pulizia del sensore se non buoi vedere nel cielo degli effetti tipo contraerea  . (imho) . ciao, lauro |
| sent on May 18, 2014 (20:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride. The distortion is due to the low angle upward, then the distortion is desired, the sensor is clean I do not understand where you see the stains from dirt sensor. Ciaoo Grazie del passaggio. La distorsione e dovuta alla inquadratura dal basso verso l'alto, la distorsione quindi è voluta, il sensore è pulito non capisco dove vedi le macchie da sensore sporco. Ciaoo |
| sent on May 18, 2014 (20:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The sensor is not clean if someone identifies countless spots in the central part of the sky and only two left. To make a rebuttal tomorrow takes to the sky and close to f.22. For the falling lines even if the unintended you, you could also groped not esasperarle by tilting the camera down and subsequently cutting out above and below to embrace the choice of a cut panoramic (one of 1000 interpretations) ;-). (Imho). hello, laurel Il sensore non è pulito se qualcuno individua le innumerevoli macchie nella parte centrale del cielo e solo due a sinistra. Per fare una controprova domani scatta verso il cielo e chiudi a f.22 . Per le linee cadenti anche se le hai volute , potevi anche tentare di non esasperarle basculando la reflex verso il basso e successivamente ritagliando sopra e sotto fino ad abbracciare la scelta di un taglio panoramico (una della 1000 interpretazioni)  . (imho) . ciao, lauro |
| sent on May 18, 2014 (21:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I've seen the spots, you're right, a cut above the sky I tried to do it, but it seemed that the villa was crushed, even for the distortions marked.
Grazir yet laurel hello Ho visto le macchie, hai ragione, un taglio sopra il cielo ho provato a farlo, ma sembrava che la villa fosse schiacciata, anche per la distorsioni marcate.
Grazir ancora lauro ciao |
| sent on June 16, 2014 (8:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto Lauro otherwise a nice shot. hello Pier Quoto Lauro per il resto un bello scatto. ciao Pier |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
