What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 31, 2014 (17:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
good idea, nice result; I removed the blue cast from the hawk before it overlaps the bottom. congratulations! Hello, Vittorio buona l'idea, simpatico il risultato; avrei tolto la dominante blu dal falco prima di sovrapporlo al fondo. complimenti! Ciao, Vittorio |
| sent on June 09, 2014 (21:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No hawk, golden eagle but!! ;-) No falco, ma aquila reale!!!!  |
| sent on June 12, 2014 (11:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Victor, there is a bit of predominant blue due to light at that time. I could limit it a bit, but let's say it goes well, so if we want to justify, with the reflection of the blue sky :)
The hawk was locked in a cage and the only area where there was natural light was the one where I made the picture.
hello ;) Ciao Vittorio, c'è un po di predominante blu dovuta alla luce in quel momento. Un po avrei potuto limitarla, ma diciamo che si sposa bene, se così la vogliamo giustificare, con il riflesso blu del cielo :)
Il falco era chiuso in una gabbia e l'unica zona dove c'era la luce naturale era proprio quella dove ho fatto la foto.
un saluto ;) |
| sent on June 12, 2014 (11:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Domenik, I'm not sure, but I think it's hawk, so it was written on the label on the cage that housed this beautiful bird. Here it looks great, it was actually very small, classic size of a hawk.
;) Domenik, non sono sicuro, ma credo si tratti di falco, almeno così era scritto sull'etichetta posta sulla gabbia che ospitava questo splendido volatile. Qui sembra grande, in realtà era particolarmente piccolo, classica grandezza di un falco.
;) |
| sent on June 12, 2014 (14:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The hawk does not have that beak!! It is most likely an eagle and the golden eagle!! Il falco non ha quel becco!!!!! È un'aquila e molto probabilmente l'aquila reale!!!! |
| sent on June 12, 2014 (14:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In any case you can always call someone in the park to see what can really be .... In ogni caso puoi sempre chiamare qualcuno del parco per sapere cosa possa essere veramente.... |
| sent on September 25, 2014 (17:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think the whole series is very bella..l'ho watched with interest because I too photographer with Nex and I have the same optics. I see that the 55-210 confirms perspective on the whole very good, when it uses the center, while the edges, in the sample in my possession, I have noticed a drop in resolution really high. Do you wonder if you also have the same problem.
Congratulations for the photos. :-)
Hello, Gabriel.
PS. How far away were you and how did you get this zoom focal photo? Trovo che tutta la serie sia molto bella..l'ho guardata con interesse perché anch'io fotografo con Nex e ho le stesse ottiche. Vedo che il 55-210 si conferma un'ottica tutto sommato ottima, quando si sfrutta il centro, mentre ai bordi, nell'esemplare in mio possesso, ho riscontrato una caduta di risoluzione veramente alta. Ti chiedo se anche tu hai lo stesso problema.
Complimenti per le foto.
Ciao, Gabriele.
PS. A che distanza eri e con quale focale dello zoom hai ottenuto questa foto? |
| sent on October 09, 2014 (10:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gabriele,
thanks :) even if the photo posted there is a lack of resolution and some errors in post-production. The output from the camera is cleaner.
With the 55-210 I was fine and I have not noticed a shortage at the edges. Let's say for the type of lens and for the price it is a perspective that gave me some satisfaction not just!
The distance from the subject was remarkable and I shot zooming to maximum (210) @Gabriele,
grazie :) anche se la foto postata c'è una carenza di risoluzione e qualche errore in post-produzione. Quella uscita dalla fotocamera è più pulita.
Con il 55-210 mi sono trovato benissimo e non ho notato una carenza ai bordi. Diciamo che per il tipo di ottica e per il prezzo che ha è un'ottica che mi ha regalato delle soddisfazioni non da poco!
La distanza dal soggetto era notevole ed ho scattato zummando al massimo (210) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
19.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
