RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
God's eye...

Paesaggi

View gallery (21 photos)

God's eye sent on April 29, 2014 (14:52) by Simone_n. 6 comments, 595 views. [retina]

at 70mm, 1/4000 f/5.6, ISO 800, hand held.




View High Resolution 17.9 MP  

5 persons like it: Ale27, Alessandro57, Alessandro_P, Salvo M, Ste2


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on August 05, 2014 (11:14)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Immagine molto suggestiva con un titolo perfetto ;-)
Ciao Ciao Salvo

Very striking image with a perfect title ;-)
Hello Hello Salvo

avatarjunior
sent on August 05, 2014 (11:25)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Grazie Salvo!

Thanks Salvo!

avatarsenior
sent on August 05, 2014 (15:03)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


bel momento di luce, ma tagliato a dx
orizzonte storto, cielo rumoroso
sul primoi piano si poteva fare di meglio

my 2cents, f


beautiful moment of light, but cut to the right
crooked horizon, sky noisy
primoi on the floor you could do better

my 2Cents, f

avatarjunior
sent on August 05, 2014 (15:21)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Grazie Fracas per le tue osservazioni, molto utili...in effetti non posso che condividerle...
Sul primo piano cosa intendi con si poteva fare meglio? Mi daresti un giudizio un pò più dettagliato?
Nel mio intento il fatto di lasciare il primo piano così in ombra avrebbe dovuto indirizzare l'attenzione soprattutto sui raggi di luce, per cui non ho dato molta importanza al primo piano...tu come l'hai interpretata?
Grazie! Ciao!

Fracas Thanks for your comments, very helpful ... in fact I can not share ...
On the first floor do you mean, you could do better? Would you give me an opinion a little more detail?
In my view the fact of leaving the foreground in shadow so would have to direct attention primarily on the rays of light, so I did not give much importance to the first floor ... how did you played?
Thank you! Hello!

avatarsenior
sent on August 06, 2014 (12:34)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


ciao,
- intendo che non avrei incluso gli alberelli tagliati sulla sx, alzando la fotocamera o magari puntando + a dx
- peraltro alzando la fotocamera si sarebbe spostata verso il basso la linea dell'orizzonte col vantaggio di dedicare + parte del fotogramma al soggetto principale, lasciando mare e promontorio a fare da contesto.
- forse avrei anche lasciato un filo di dettaglio nel primo piano in ombra: personalmente vedo + il nero profondo con una silhoutte ben riconoscibile (un faro, un albero, una persona), mentre in questo caso poco (ma proprio poco) dettaglio poteva aiutare
- in aggiunta puntando + a destra (oltre che + in alto) poteva aiutare a non tagliare i raggi sulla dx

spero di essere stato utile
francesco

hello,
- I mean that I would not have included the trees cut on the left, raising the camera or maybe pointing to the right +
- However, raising the camera would move down the line of the horizon with the advantage of devoting + part of the frame to the main subject, leaving the sea and headland to act as a context.
- Maybe I even left a bit of detail in the foreground in shadow: I personally see + deep black with a silhouette recognizable (a lighthouse, a tree, a person), but in this case a little (but just a little) detail could help
- + In addition to pointing to the right (as well as + above) could help not to cut the spokes on the right

I hope I was helpful
francis

avatarjunior
sent on August 06, 2014 (13:15)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Ciao,
certo che sei stato utile, ti ringrazio per avermi dato un parere più approfondito (non capita spesso ;-)).
Ho capito meglio cosa intendevi..in realtà ho fatto diversi scatti con varie inquadrature ma non ricordo perchè ho inserito proprio questa... Il punto era che, volendo includere tutta l'ampiezza della zona di mare colpita dai raggi all'orizzonte, avrei dovuto stare più corto con la focale con la conseguenza di avere il soggetto principale molto più piccolo nell'intero fotogramma.
Ciao!

Hello,
certain that you have been helpful, thank you for giving me a more profound opinion (not often ;-)).
I understand better what you mean .. I actually did several shots with various shots but I do not remember why I put this right ... The point was that, if you want to include the full width of the area affected by the rays of the sea on the horizon, I had to stay with the shortest focal length with the result of having the main subject much smaller than the entire frame.
Hello!


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me