What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 26, 2014 (11:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful light! You must, however, "all the way" to deepen the PP with Photoshop or Lightroom. ;-) Hello Mauro Bella luce! Devi però "in tutti i modi" approfondire la PP con Photoshop o Lightroom. Ciao Mauro |
| sent on April 26, 2014 (21:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, thanks for the comment, if you have any suggestions I am grateful, since it's' just that shot ... I resisted a little 'to eliminate a little' noise .... Ciao, grazie per il commento, se hai consigli ti sono grato, visto che e' da poco che scatto...l'ho contrastata un po' per eliminare un po' il rumore.... |
| sent on April 27, 2014 (11:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Without disturbing PS or LR, it was enough to open at least two stop the diaphragm resulting in a lower ISO value (value 400) and everything would have won. ;-) ;-)
greetings Roberto Senza scomodare PS o LR , bastava aprire di almeno due stop il diaframma con conseguente abbassamento del valore ISO ( valore 400 ) e tutto ne avrebbe guadagnato. saluti Roberto |
| sent on April 27, 2014 (12:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beware of overexposed areas ;-) The right side is overexposed, so the lights in the bottom of the view. Probably in those areas you can work in PP, but if you start with the optimal management of the shot, the problems to be solved in PP decreased dramatically, up to almost not be necessary. greetings Roberto Attenzione alle zone sovraesposte La parte destra è sovraesposta, così anche le luci in fondo al panorama. Probabilmente in quelle zone si può agire in PP, ma se inizi con la gestione ottimale dello scatto, i problemi da risolvere in PP diminuiscono enormemente, sino a non essere quasi necessari. saluti Roberto |
| sent on April 27, 2014 (12:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Roberto true, and I pay for inexperience, I thought so too when I saw the pictures on your PC. .. Thanks for the ride and for helpful advice ... hello Vero Roberto, e che pago di inesperienza, l'ho pensato anch'io quando ho visto la foto sul PC. ..grazie per il passaggio e per gli utili consigli...ciao |
| sent on April 27, 2014 (16:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree that the noise of the sky is given by the high iso, with tripod shooting in manual I set the ring with M max ISO 100 and keep it for the shots reasoned for the rest there are other programs where you can keep the automatic as you want Concordo che il rumore del cielo è dato dagli iso alti, col cavalletto scatta in manuale io imposto con la ghiera in M iso max 100 e la tengo per gli scatti ragionati per tutto il resto ci sono gli altri programmi dove puoi tenere gli automatismi come vuoi |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |