What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 15, 2014 (0:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello Anomerol,
could be a really beautiful shot! shame about the noise so high and also for the colors (at least on my monitor). Do you think that the noise is due to the filter + ISO 500 or to post-production?
And then I wondered: why use ISO 500? Do not lower it agreed? by doing so you could also accentuate the effect on the water, as well as reduce a little 'noise.
Have fun
ciao Anomerol,
poteva essere un gran bello scatto! peccato per il rumore così elevato e anche per i colori (almeno sul mio monitor). Pensi che il rumore sia dovuto al filtro + iso 500 o alla post-produzione?
E poi mi chiedevo: perchè usare iso 500? Non conveniva abbassarlo? così facendo avresti potuto anche accentuare l'effetto sull'acqua, oltre che ridurre un po' di rumore.
Buon divertimento
|
| sent on April 15, 2014 (12:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
mister_lack hello :) I'm glad that the shot itself in the meantime you like it: it was my first outing with the ND filter and I have yet to take the necessary familiarity :-) regarding the noise .. I would give my fault to post-production, shooting the 'I had to fix a little' saw that the light was very hard and the sky was almost white (it was not a great day). That said, looking on the PC before loading all that grain was not there, just as there is not even if you look on flickr (https://www.flickr.com/photos/anomerol/13797608273/) .. As regards iso my priority was to take half a second exposure, after several attempts I found at that time the most pleasant effect of water moved :-) (I actually could not close the diaphragm and lower the ISO, but there for I had not imagined there chand could leave the noise). However, I have not absolutely satisfied and come back as soon as I have time to do it with a light and a sky the best ;-)
thanks for the comment and for the very right (and like) observations.
lorenzo ciao mister_lack :) mi fa piacere intanto che lo scatto in sè ti piaccia: era la mia prima uscita col filtro ND e devo ancora prenderci la dovuta dimestichezza  per quanto riguarda il rumore.. darei la colpa alla postproduzione, lo scatto l'ho dovuto sistemare un po' visto che la luce era molto dura e il cielo era praticamente bianco (non era una gran bella giornata). Detto questo guardandola sul PC prima di caricarla tutta quella grana non c'era, così come non c'è neanche se la guardi su flickr (https://www.flickr.com/photos/anomerol/13797608273/).. Per quanto riguarda gli iso la mia priorità era di scattare con mezzo secondo di esposizione, dopo vari tentativi avevo individuato in quel tempo il più piacevole effetto di mosso dell'acqua (avrei effettivamente potuto chiudere il diaframma e abbassare gli ISO, ma lì per lì non avevo immaginato che potesse uscire quel rumore). Comunque anch'io non sono assolutamente soddisfatto e appena ho tempo torno a farlo con una luce ed un cielo migliori 
grazie mille per il commento e per le giustissime (e gradite) osservazioni.
lorenzo |
| sent on April 15, 2014 (18:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I've never tried an ND filter, but I want to catch it early ;-) Can I ask that ND did you use here?
Flickr photo and 'clearly better in fact. Maybe next time you should first rescale the picture with some software and then upload it to Juza.
Saro 'curious to see the next shots ;-)
Have fun
alessandro Non ho mai provato un filtro ND, ma vorrei prenderlo presto ;-) Posso chiederti che ND hai usato qui?
Su Flickr la foto e' chiaramente migliore in effetti. Magari la prossima volta ti conviene prima riscalare la foto con qualche software e poi caricarla su Juza.
Saro' curioso di vedere i prossimi scatti ;-)
Buon divertimento
alessandro |
| sent on April 15, 2014 (19:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Here I used a filter Hoya ND 400, not knowing quite how to orient the choice I simply took what he uses www.flickr.com/photos/cassara/ because I like a lot his photos, including mine and it runs its still a long road though ;-)
What do you mean when you say "rescale the picture with some program"? :-)
qui ho usato un filtro Hoya ND 400, non sapendo assolutamente come orientarmi nella scelta ho preso semplicemente quello che usa lui www.flickr.com/photos/cassara/ perchè mi piacciono un sacco le sue foto, tra la mia e le sue ne corre ancora molta di strada però
cosa intendi quando dici "riscalare la foto con qualche programma" ?
|
| sent on April 16, 2014 (11:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So you should lose about 8-9 stops right?
"Rescale" I intend to resize it to 1200 pixels on the long side, which if I'm not mistaken is the format here on Juza. If you upload your photo on Juza in a larger format, it is automatically resized using its internal system, which is probably not as efficient as that of Flickr, since in your case seems to have introduced noise. Quindi dovresti perdere sugli 8-9 stop giusto?
"Riscalare" intendo ridimensionarla a 1200 pixel sul lato lungo, che se non mi sbaglio è il formato qui su Juza. Se tu carichi la tua foto su Juza in un formato più grande, viene automaticamente ridimensionata utilizzando il suo sistema interno, che probabilmente non è efficiente quanto quello di Flickr, dato che nel tuo caso sembra aver introdotto del rumore. |
| sent on April 16, 2014 (16:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
okok thank you very much, I did not know of this problem of size in the upload :) anyway it is a filter that causes you to lose 9 stop :-) okok grazie mille, non sapevo di questo problema di dimensioni nel caricarle :) comunque si, è un filtro che ti fa perdere 9 stop |
| sent on July 14, 2014 (21:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Focusing on the beautiful water movement the noise less noticeable, beautiful, I like very much. Concentrando l'attenzione sullo stupendo movimento dell'acqua anche il rumore si nota meno, bella, mi piace molto. |
| sent on July 15, 2014 (9:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Siro, I'm glad you're able to focus on the movement of water: that was the subject of the picture:-D Grazie Siro, mi fa piacere che tu sia riuscito a concentrarti sul movimento dell'acqua: era quello il soggetto della foto  |
| sent on August 13, 2014 (21:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'll leave the comments that have already been made, for me it's pretty even so, at first glance it seemed to me in HDR, congratulations;-)
a greeting Lascio i commenti che già sono stati fatti ,per me è bella anche così , alla prima vista mi sembrava in HDR , complimenti
un saluto |
| sent on August 13, 2014 (21:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thank you very much Claudio:-) HDR nothing, yet I do not know how to do it! grazie mille Claudio niente HDR, ancora non so neanche come si faccia! |
| sent on January 21, 2015 (21:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful photo compliments
Regards Gianni Bella foto complimenti
Saluti Gianni |
| sent on January 21, 2015 (21:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks a lot Gianni, see you soon! :-)
lorenzo grazie mille Gianni, a presto!
lorenzo |
| sent on January 21, 2015 (22:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful composition and colors, excellent and original pp, congratulations! Belle composizione e cromie, ottima e originale pp, complimenti! |
| sent on January 22, 2015 (0:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks also to you diamond! :-D Grazie anche a te diamante! |
| sent on February 09, 2016 (22:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The landscape is beautiful
the water dynamism is truly exceptional
the contrast perhaps excessive in this case pleases me a lot and creates an almost "violent"
good job
Gionskj Il paesaggio è bellissimo
il dinamismo dell'acqua è davvero eccezionale
il contrasto forse eccessivo in questo caso mi aggrada molto e crea un'atmosfera quasi "violenta"
ottimo lavoro
Gionskj |
| sent on February 09, 2016 (22:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful tonalità..il pdr and effect of water among the rocks.
I like very much.
Compliments.
Francis Molto belle le tonalità..il pdr e l effetto dell acqua tra le rocce.
Mi piace molto.
Complimenti.
Francesco |
| sent on February 10, 2016 (19:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Many thanks to both !! :-) Grazie mille a entrambi!! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
