JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on January 02, 2012 (17:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It was about 17 and the night had not yet fallen! More than night time blue is a shot sent! :) Because the stars are seen little I opted for a cut 16:9. Erano le 17 circa e la notte ancora non era calata !!! Più che notturno è uno scatto all'ora blu inoltrata!!! :) Siccome le stelle si vedono poco ho optato per un taglio 16:9 .
sent on January 02, 2012 (22:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Some more detail did not hurt ... but the shot is not bad transmits a nice atmosphere. Certo un maggiore dettaglio non guastava...però lo scatto non è male trasmette una bella atmosfera.
sent on January 03, 2012 (13:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my opinion, these answers do not make sense! The thing 'subjective and even though I used 200 ISO and the stars and see little' always a night! If I had used 800 iso the stars would come out but the soil while ritoccandolo with ps I did not like, was even more mixed! The beauty of this shot, at least according to me is not 'the sky but the attmosfera ch gives Castelluccio and artificial lighting of machines, which may appeal as no! ;) In a fit night exposure can not be natural, but more or less true! Maybe I'm wrong title .... Thanks for the steps! ;) Secondo me queste risposte non hanno senso!!! La cosa e' soggettiva e anche se ho usato 200 iso e le stelle si vedono poco e' sempre un notturno!!! Se avessi usato 800 iso le stelle sarebbero venute fuori ma il suolo pur ritoccandolo con ps non mi piaceva, veniva ancora piu impastato!! Il bello almeno secondo me di questo scatto non e' il cielo ma l'attmosfera ch regala Castelluccio e le luci artificiali delle macchine, che può piacere come no!!!;) In uno scatto notturno l'esposizione non può essere naturale, ma piu o meno fedele!!! Forse ho sbagliato il titolo.... Grazie per i passaggi !!;)
sent on January 03, 2012 (15:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well, it's a night is beyond doubt. It is also an excellent shot. I like the picture as it is. Compliments. Hello, Diego. Beh, che sia un notturno è fuor di dubbio. Che sia un'ottimo scatto anche. A me la foto piace così com'è. Complimenti. Ciao, Diego.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
