Swan | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Birds

17.9 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Animali View gallery (8 photos)

Swan sent on April 01, 2014 (13:56) by Falex. 8 comments, 452 views.

at 300mm, 1/400 f/5.6, ISO 200, hand held.

Vi chiedo la cortesia, in base ai dati di scatto, di segnalarmi tutti gli errori o difetti della foto. Ho la ferma convinzione che molte o tutte le foto che faccio con l'accoppiata 600D + Tamron siano sfocate Grazie

View High Resolution 17.9 MP

1 person like it: Albertopantellini

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Uggi

sent on April 02, 2014 (10:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

(From what I see with the phone) this seems to me to focus. The neck has a nice detail, the nose is perhaps a little dark, but it seems to me to focus. A 5.6 should have a good pdc to focus around the swan and so it seems to me. The photo is beautiful. (Maybe I should not cut the swan down, but then again I'm nobody :) so it may well be a cag * ta:-D)

Loreppo

sent on April 02, 2014 (11:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The swan is underexposed due to the reflective background. Use +1 exposure compensation or even here on the spot.

Falex

sent on April 02, 2014 (11:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you so much ... I had to cut the swan down ... because there was a crappy plastic bottle abandoned ... I asked him to move but he was a dude.

Thanks Loreppo, is one of the many gaps that have to be able to correct the compensation when there are strong reflections

Loreppo

sent on April 02, 2014 (11:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Now you audience an example of compensation in a similar situation.

Loreppo

sent on April 02, 2014 (11:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Here it is. Never mind the fact that it is taken from so far away ... it was the day that I ran back to my daughter and close at sunset I was dead tired and sat on a bench at about fifteen feet from her :-|

Falex

sent on April 02, 2014 (12:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks ... I'll keep Loreppo certainly account because I really like it when they take to the lake or the sea

Roberto Marchitelli

sent on April 02, 2014 (12:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The subject is underexposed relative to the background, I would try at least to open the shadows.
The resume point is high, if you had lowered'd have a background completely blurred, giving three-dimensional clicks.
The composition is good and poses interesting.
In the photo to the birds, almost always use spot metering to avoid backgrounds illuminated differently deceive the exposure chamber.
For the af always use single point, the servo for moving subjects, for the one-shot static.
Hello
Roberto

Falex

sent on April 02, 2014 (13:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Steve ...
Unfortunately there was a descent to the sea and could not stoop over. In the prox place other days I made directly in Jpeg (before I realized the importance of raw).
Exposure sopt, this I have to study well. It will be the task of the w.end.
To always use the center AF if I may, on the 600D seems to me the only reliable.
Thanks again

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.