Foroglio waterfall

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

20.5 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

paesaggi 2 View gallery (21 photos)

Foroglio waterfall sent on March 30, 2014 (14:12) by Gerry Fornera. 4 comments, 191 views.

at 24mm, 1.6 sec f/14.0, ISO 100, tripod.

View High Resolution 20.5 MP

2 persons like it: Albertopantellini, Il Vime

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Falena

sent on March 30, 2014 (16:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the waterfall is nice, shame about the loss of heaven, an ND filter would help you a lot, hello ;-)

Gerry Fornera

sent on March 30, 2014 (17:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I was on this 32 nd filter are 17 photos taken for horizontal and mounted with photoshop is a test hello thanks anyway

Falena

sent on March 31, 2014 (0:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I suggest an HDR is much better to have the widest tonal range. hello ;-)

Gerry Fornera

sent on March 31, 2014 (5:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

is already in hdr but I did not do the picture with the camera is just an edited photo in HDR but this is just an experiment because I tried to take pictures vertically and mount is too distorted horizontally is good then I would have 17 photos do it again in the summer with a beautiful green vegetation is the first time that pissed so many pictures that I did not know you could with photomerge anyway thanks for the advice shame because the photo is not bad but the sky clouds a little burned will be for the next time hello thanks good day

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.