JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on December 29, 2011 (14:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello, I would advise a few things:
1) do more shots and the average image, even in the PS to begin, so elimiare the background noise 2) shoot at low ISO and a short time (see the histogram in preview) 3) in astrophotography normally (but it is a matter of taste) you do not use the rule of thirds to center objects so symmetrical. Best shot centered 4) convert to black and white hello ciao, mi permetto di consigliarti alcune cose:
1) fai più scatti e media l'immagine, anche in PS per iniziare, in modo da elimiare il rumore di fondo 2) scatta a bassi iso e tempi brevi (guarda l'istogramma in preview) 3) in astrofotografia normalmente (ma è questione di gusti) non si usa la regola dei terzi per centrare oggetti così simmetrici. Meglio un'inquadratura centrata 4) converti in bianco e nero ciao
sent on December 30, 2011 (12:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry Ildiora no offense but frankly: 1) I do not see noise, at least at this resolution 2) the photo does not seem overexposed therefore do not understand why you say you shoot at low ISO and short 3) I could give you this right, but in this case does not seem bad the decentralized 4) I think is very beautiful and romantic way.
Forgive me but, frankly, seems to me a good picture, as far as detail that inevitably goes away when the moon is full. Scusa Ildiora senza offesa ma francamente: 1)non vedo rumore di fondo, almeno a questa risoluzione 2)la foto non mi sembra sovraesposta dunque non capisco perchè dici di scattare a bassi iso e tempi brevi 3)su questo ti potrei dar ragione ma in questo caso non mi sembra male il decentrato 4)per me è molto bella e romantica così.
Perdonami ma francamente a me appare una bella foto, nei limiti del dettaglio che inevitabilmente va via quando la luna è piena.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
