JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user6267
sent on June 26, 2014 (8:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The view is definitely the strong point of your image. The composition of the find and correct the lighting situation that you are getting is really interesting.
I can not explain, however, the quality of 'image in general. Too doughy, lacking detail and noise especially noticeable in the sky (imho). I read the technical details of the camera that is able to shoot in RAW. Maybe you have some setting wrong?
Have a nice day ;-) Il panorama è sicuramente il punto forte della tua immagine. La composizione la trovo corretta e la situazione di luce che hai trovato è davvero interessante.
Non mi spiego però la qualità d' immagine in generale. Troppo pastosa, priva di dettagli e con rumore evidente soprattutto sul cielo (imho). Leggo dalla scheda tecnica della fotocamera che è in grado di scattare in raw. Forse hai sbagliato qualche impostazione?
sent on June 26, 2014 (9:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Felux Hello and thank you for the analysis. The problems that I highlight alas known. The photo is a revival of a few years ago, a rather anonymous jpg that I wanted to make it interesting now that I've learned a little 'more things on the PP In addition to being a jpg which I subsequently had a hand, resulting in a general loss, noise at high ISO whatever was unfortunately a constant fuji in question, even in bright sunlight. Furthermore, the fact that the photo was taken using tuti 720mm equivalent superzoom the fuji does not help the overall quality! Thank you for the inspiration of constructive self-criticism, it always helps to improve! Have a nice day! Ciao Felux e grazie per l'analisi. I problemi che evidenzi mi sono ahimè noti. La foto è una riesumazione di qualche anno fa, un jpg piuttosto anonimo che ho voluto rendere interessante adesso che ho imparato un po' di cose in più sulla PP Oltre a essere un jpg a cui ho messo mano successivamente, con conseguente perdita generale, il rumore elevato a qualsiasi ISO era purtroppo una costante della fuji in questione, anche in piena luce. Inoltre il fatto che la foto sia stata scattata usando tuti i 720mm equivalenti di superzoom della fuji non aiuta la qualità generale! Grazie per lo spunto di autocritica costruttiva, aiuta sempre per migliorarsi! Buona giornata!
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
