RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape (wilderness)
  4. » Sasso, boat, mountains

 
Sasso, boat, mountains...

Paesaggi

View gallery (6 photos)

Sasso, boat, mountains sent on March 02, 2014 (20:09) by Falconfab. 26 comments, 1962 views.

, 1/320 f/9.0, ISO 200, hand held. Lago di Campotosto, Italy.

"Questa foto è stata presentata al tagCircoloFotografico" Lago di Campotosto





PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 244000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on March 02, 2014 (20:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Pretty good. Where are you?

avatarsenior
sent on March 03, 2014 (11:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the composition works fairly, having the 3 subjects on different levels. Too heavy, in my opinion, the boulder in the foreground, and the light is bad and ruin a little of everything. :-)

Hello
Max

avatarjunior
sent on March 03, 2014 (12:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Quoto for the rock ... I cut with a panoramic and maybe a little 'more saturation or b & n (I can not decide) would be a very nice photo!

avatarsenior
sent on March 03, 2014 (16:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

quoto much for B & N

avatarsenior
sent on March 03, 2014 (18:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=780960&l=it

what do you think?

avatarsenior
sent on March 03, 2014 (23:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I also have a version pano, now the public

avatarsenior
sent on March 04, 2014 (0:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

BN definitely better

avatarsenior
sent on March 04, 2014 (10:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Better in b / w, but the conversion is a bit 'too flat and uninteresting. You should work on it a bit '! ;-)
To me that rock in the foreground did not like it at all, but I do not sfango landscapes whatever! :-D
Hello
Barbara

avatarjunior
sent on March 04, 2014 (12:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I allowed myself to change a bit 'your pictures ... if you do not want the levo immediately!
I was thinking about something like this:





or b & w





In my opinion (and apparently I'm not alone ...) the boulder is too intrusive ...

avatarsenior
sent on March 04, 2014 (18:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Retrieving what I have not done before for reasons of time:
Thanks David (Campotosto, including Abruzzo, Lazio and brands)
Thanks Max,
Thanks Arconudo,
Thanks Mignolo.
all comments are very welcome. In general I think a little 'reflect a greater maturity mine, but for the most part, what works in this shot was suggested to me by my Nile, what is wrong, however, is all my own work! :-D

Let 's see what I can do to improve the picture. The cuts proposed by pinky (Please do not remove it), it seems to work pretty well. However, it seems to me that it is to lose a little 'magic of the wide-angle, with its distortions, does take a bit' of meaning to the photo. We say thatits a cutout 50mm. I have researched (obviously with the results considerably improvable), a triple focal plane. Sure, a stone is not a subject of such importance as to justify such a portion, but if the subject in the foreground was a cat, maybe the outcome would have been far more valuable. Or am I wrong?

I also made another version of the same scenario. Here, however, it seems to me that the stone is too insignificant to justify the framing that is cautious.
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=781411&l=it



avatarsenior
sent on March 04, 2014 (19:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Barbara. a special thank you for your welcome step. However do not even know where to begin to make the conversion to b / w more interesting. In the sense that not enough for me ... I need a tutorial just to better understand what you mean and then create my own taste of a genre that I always have a little 'snubbed because, all too often, I've seen used (or best abuse) to recover bad photo with lights preposterous (more or less as in this case). Let me explain, a good photo should already be imagined ... and not recovered. However, I realize now that, in some cases, the colors are completely unnecessary and if you can save a nice cut, removing the light feeling bad, may be an option to take into account. I mean, I when I imagined the pictures, I saw in the viewfinder, I was not impressed by the colors butonly by the combination water / boat / mountains, and (thanks to the Nile) stone.

avatarsenior
sent on March 05, 2014 (8:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Fabrizio, the light was that it was more difficult to make. Probably with a 10-20 setback would have given you a greater harmony between the various elements. Use a supergrandangolo is not easy, you have to try a lot. I'm shooting in the vertical I lost the drops of water on the knob.

avatarsenior
sent on March 05, 2014 (9:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

To me, the conversion b / w you've done, is completely missing blacks. And 'gray, so it's a black and gray black and white. And 'as such in neutral as you have taken color: no color = no black and white.

With regard to the discourse on the abuse of the conversions, I do not deny that he had converted to b / w, at times, the shots that color did not convince me, but in the vast majority of cases improve slightly and continue to remain mediocre shots despite the conversion.
So when a shot is not convincing, the best way would always remain the trash or, if you do not want to just throw away, sharing with friends on FB! ;-)
According to me a good b / w must already have a good base already on the original color, but I think it all those who photograph, is the classicalphysics discovery of hot water!
If you want to learn how to reason directly in b / w, you buy a monochrome and you start to think only for b / w, as did billo1 ;-)
Or, since our cameras allow it, even if you shoot in RAW, you can see the result on the monitor in mono, so you start to become familiar with the b / w.
Hello
Barbara

avatarjunior
sent on March 05, 2014 (10:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Playing with selective contrast might improve it a bit 'leaving the boulder and the idea of ??giving more plans that are separated:









According to me it is not a photo to trash ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on March 05, 2014 (11:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Nile. Yes, the light was not that great. However, with one eye a little 'more trained (like yours), I would have been able to take advantage of the few moments of open sky. Oh well, it will be the next one! In particular, they are a bit 'disappointed with the result of the photo pano format because, in my opinion, if I had put the two parties in the neighboring strong points, I would have gotten the result of bias that I had suggested. So, let's say that you were talking about, I can see now, as then I missed it completely! :-)

avatarsenior
sent on March 05, 2014 (11:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Pinky. Both the photos you've proposed are much better than mine. I especially like how you have enhanced the sky. Let me think a little bit ...

@ Barbara. As soon as I get a minute I try to do a conversion following your directions.

avatarsenior
sent on March 05, 2014 (13:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I found another shot without too many drops. I removed them and the result is not bad ... later there the place! :)

@ Barbara, I came back because I have a bit 'of days off! :-D

avatarsenior
sent on March 05, 2014 (14:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ok, but you can not completely abandon us when you work! Are you a government official, let us see that you, as they want to clichés, you're in the office only to fuck on Juza and to warm the chair! :-D:-D:-D

The evidence of Pinky I like. Even in my shooting, although I do not enthusiasms because ME does not excite the landscapes in general, it is not trash. Surely you have to enhance it more, because as you've posted is just flat / haggard, both color and b / w. Already better exploit the sky and the color of the rocks in the foreground, can be change the face of the shooting. ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on March 05, 2014 (17:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hmmm no fee service which I can use to edit photos? ImageStack vo 'them money! : P


@ Barbara: Of course skald the chair! Cabbages! Mica I autoriscaldata the chair in the office! You do not know that there is spendingreviù? But how do I go about Juza? Should I move the chair, turn on the pc, scratch my head, press the keys ... ue, I am out of breath just thinking about all this trouble! : P

avatarsenior
sent on March 05, 2014 (17:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I tried so

[URL =] www.flickr.com/photos/92307262 @ N05/12952423335/lightbox /


[URL =] www.flickr.com/photos/92307262 @ N05/12952399814/lightbox /





Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me