What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 02, 2014 (17:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Franco. I am heartened by what you say. A few months ago I launched a post on duplicator yes / no doubler. But it seems that today is no longer a problem, use them all and they said only 4. ;-):-P Grazie Franco. Mi rincuora quello che dici. Qualche mese fa ho lanciato un post su duplicatore sì / duplicatore no. Ma sembra che oggi non sia più un problema, li usano tutti e mi hanno risposto solo in 4.   |
| sent on March 02, 2014 (18:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For me it is very good, even considering the factor of the minimum distance of maf that this combination is excellent. Per me è ottimo, anche considerando il fattore della minima distanza di maf che con questa combinazione è ottima. |
| sent on March 02, 2014 (18:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact, more than 25 years ago, suggested my Canon 300 f: 2.8 with two dedicated extender as a true revolution. But when you asked an opinion in Canon technicians, they recommended you use only 1.4X.
When three years ago (23 years later) Juza published evidence of 300 f: 2.8 is the 2X II and III, I realized that this was different duplicator, had curves that are even better than my old 1.4X. Juza implied between the lines that was even better the new 1.4 III. I've purchased them both and I immediately resold the 1 .4 X III because it was better than my old old version 1.4X.
Instead, the 2X III, and held it for two years I photographed practically only with that. :-) :-) :-) In realtà, più di 25 anni fa, Canon propose il mio 300 f:2.8 con i due extender dedicati come una vera e propria rivoluzione. Ma quando chiedevi un parere ai tecnici Canon, ti raccomandavano di usare il solo 1.4X.
Quando tre anni fa (23 anni dopo) Juza pubblicò la prova del 300 f:2.8 is II e del 2X III, mi accorsi che questo duplicatore era diverso, aveva curve persino migliori del mio vecchio 1.4X. Juza lasciava intendere tra le righe che andava meglio persino del nuovo 1.4 III. Io li ho acquistati tutti e due e ho subito rivenduto l'1.4X III perchè non era meglio del mio vecchio 1.4X old version.
Invece il 2X III lo tenni e per due anni ho fotografato praticamente solo con quello.  |
| sent on March 03, 2014 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wonderful series! Bravissimo! :-D ;-) Meravigliosa serie! Bravissimo! |
| sent on March 03, 2014 (22:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Fulvio. Coming from a fine photographer like you, I'm very pleased. :-| :-) Grazie Fulvio. Detto da un fotografo raffinato come te, mi fa veramente piacere.  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
Mi sa che devo ancora mangiarne di pagnotte! Rimane il fatto che queste tue immagini sono davvero ottime e spettacolari!