What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user23557 | sent on February 17, 2014 (18:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This photo escapes but 'in my opinion deserving, in my opinion the only thing' that you could close more 'diaphragm so' to have greater depth ', the mountains behind have a nice light but not really sharp, hello. Questa foto sfugge ma e' a mio avviso meritevole, secondo me l'unica cosa e' che si poteva chiudere di piu' il diaframma cosi' da avere maggior profondita', le montagne dietro hanno una bella luce ma non sono nitidissime, ciao. |
| sent on February 17, 2014 (18:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ This picture but escapes and 'worthy in my opinion, I think the only thing' that you could close more 'diaphragm so' to have greater depth ', the mountains behind have a nice light but not really sharp , hello.
„
Cumulus Hello, thanks for the like and, more importantly, of the comment. The photo actually has more than a few default. The sky is clear, for example, burned, was taken in jpeg and I could not do much. And yet I liked the shafts of light on the mountains, so that I prefer this photo to another very similar and exhibited better. How far would you have closed? Hello
" Questa foto sfugge ma e' a mio avviso meritevole, secondo me l'unica cosa e' che si poteva chiudere di piu' il diaframma cosi' da avere maggior profondita', le montagne dietro hanno una bella luce ma non sono nitidissime, ciao.
"
Ciao Cumulus, grazie del mi piace e, soprattutto, del commento. La foto in realtà ha più di qualche difetto. Il cielo per esempio è chiaramente bruciato; è stata scattata in jpeg e non ho potuto farci molto. E pure mi piacevano le lame di luce sulle montagne, tanto da farmi preferire questa foto a un'altra molto simile ed esposta meglio. Fino a quanto avresti chiuso? Ciao |
user23557 | sent on February 17, 2014 (18:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my opinion there is burning, not 'excessive and the whole thing probably' very close to the situation realte you've lived, I would have done at least f14 or f16. Secondo me la bruciatura ci sta, non e' eccessiva e il tutto probabilmente e' molto vicino alla situazione realte che hai vissuto, avrei fatto almeno f14 o anche f16. |
| sent on April 29, 2014 (17:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice indeed! Those raggii sun filter on the right give the photo a touch that I particularly appreciate
Davvero molto bella! Quei raggii di sole filtranti sulla destra danno alla fotografia un tocco in più che apprezzo particolarmente
|
| sent on April 29, 2014 (20:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks Michele!
grazie Michele!
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
14.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
