RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Roby...

Persone

View gallery (4 photos)

Roby sent on February 04, 2014 (17:25) by Mellon. 6 comments, 957 views.

at 50mm, 1/125 f/7.1, ISO 100, hand held.




View High Resolution 7.1 MP  

4 persons like it: Eoin88, Marcwar, Matley Siena, Quellolà


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on February 05, 2014 (16:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The portraits in natural light are never simple. I'm not really literate in the genre, but based on what little I know and for my taste, I tell you that the shadow of the nose that partially covers the face on the right is annoying. You should counter it with a reflector, it would also fitted the blinds of the windows of the car, you would have helped to soften shadows and illuminate the right side of the face (for the viewer).
The image does not seem very clear on the face, I think the focus will fall on both arms instead of on the eyes (but I'm not sure).
The pose I'm not crazy, I would have avoided having both hands to cover part of the face, and given a choice I would take his left hand (right for the viewer).
The lights on the face are quite high, but I think that you have not applied a lot of PP to shoot,then definitely improved.
At the moment I can not think of anything else, maybe someone more experienced than me in the pictures you can give some other indication or advice. ;-)
Hello
Barbara

user14286
avatar
sent on February 06, 2014 (13:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Also I think the pose is debatable, but apart from a few light a little high, the real "drama" here are the incomprehensible cuts, elbows and top of the head (for the series: either include or do not include them).
For my taste I would have decentralized further on the right, cutting off part of the shoulder instead, leaving the head in the top third, but I would also chosen as the background the empty spot by the trees.

avatarjunior
sent on February 06, 2014 (14:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Poison and Barbara!
Thanks for the tips. Have you pointed out that I was not convinced that pose / composition and PP.
Regarding the first I made a cutout in the second half to avoid a bench that I did not like but I think I made things worse :-/
Also on the PP I know that I'm point I did get in trouble. I wanted a little softer but I lost detail. The shadows I tried to open them to decrease the contrast as the lights ... oops ... I even get up! :-|
I know the basic photo may not be perfect but may I ask what is the best composition starting from this shot? Sorry for the hassle ...
(I put the original as it came out of the machine)




avatarsenior
sent on February 06, 2014 (15:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Honestly, after correcting the gradients of the column, I really like your version more than the set cut-out that you had done. If you do not like the bench, trim cutting back a little 'shoulder and to maintain the aspect ratio cuts over your head (you should still have the edge without going to touch even a hair ;-).)
If you have left a few leaves of trees isolated from the others, maybe make a transition to clone.
Further advice: from a vertical shot is best not to crop until it becomes horizontal, you lose further detail and sharpness. One thing is get a square cut (without further crop or approach), but it becomes horizontal again does not make sense ... you had to think about it during shooting. ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on February 06, 2014 (15:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ok thanks a lot! I will treasure ;-)
Until next time!

user14286
avatar
sent on February 06, 2014 (20:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh, but we had done the trick then! :-D

The version of "integral" should be better already, as in the whole I do not find, however, that it is a photo from scream ...

In principle I agree with Barbara on the bench, or clones, if you can, or cut as you've been told.
For the small size, you can certainly opt for a 1:1 so as to include the full head and elbows keeping a good compo avoiding those savage cuts appeared in your first version.




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me