What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 02, 2014 (9:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I had already added a similar version long ago ... this version is distinguished by the longer time (30 sec.). The additional version below has the same shooting data (30 sec f/13.0, ISO 100), xo is curious to see how the final result changes only xchè in the meantime the wind got up.
 I can not say which I prefer criticism and comments are welcome ... Greetings Avevo già inserito una versione simile tempo fa...questa versione si differenzia per i tempi più lunghi (30 sec.). L'ulteriore versione qui sotto ha gli stessi dati di scatto (30 sec f/13.0, ISO 100), xò è curioso vedere come il risultato finale cambia, solamente xchè nel frattempo si è alzato il vento.
 Non saprei dire quale preferisco...sono gradite critiche ed osservazioni Un saluto |
| sent on February 02, 2014 (23:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I really like this shot for the tones and colors. I prefer the version comment because the blur that is created makes the reflection in the water and therefore less detailed with the look I get to savor all the pictures without going too much to chase all the details
however all are excellent and two
hello
mi piace un sacco questo scatto per le tonalità e i colori. preferisco la versione commento perchè il mosso che si è creato nell'acqua rende il riflesso meno dettagliato e quindi con lo sguardo salgo a gustarmi tutta la foto senza soffermarmi troppo a rincorrere tutti i dettagli sono comunque ottime tutte e due ciao |
| sent on February 02, 2014 (23:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gianmarco Thanks for your comment, I really appreciate it! :-) A greeting and good light, Enrico Grazie Gianmarco per il tuo commento, che ho apprezzato molto! Un saluto e buona luce, Enrico |
| sent on February 26, 2014 (15:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
great tones and colors hello gran tonalità e colori ciao |
| sent on February 27, 2014 (16:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Diego! ;-) Hello, Henry Grazie mille Diego! Ciao, Enrico |
| sent on February 27, 2014 (16:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful both, I also prefer that posted in comment because aquatic plants that have a mysterious, golden algae floating but the smallest detail makes them more ambiguous ... and perfectly inserted in a line that goes up to the larches. hello Massimo Bellissime tutte e due, anche io preferisco quella postata in commento perchè le piante acquatiche hanno un che di misterioso, di alghe dorate fluttuanti ma il minor dettaglio le rende più ambigue...e perfettamente inserite in una linea che sale fino ai larici. ciao Massimo |
| sent on February 27, 2014 (16:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Max for your passage and your comment! :-) All the best, Henry Grazie Massimo per il tuo passaggio e per il tuo commento! Un saluto, Enrico |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |