RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape with human elements
  4. » Panorama towards Fermo

 
Panorama towards Fermo...

Il mio paese

View gallery (21 photos)

Panorama towards Fermo sent on December 12, 2011 (18:03) by Kramer71. 17 comments, 1767 views.

, 1/6 f/11.0, ISO 100, tripod.

Panorama verso Fermo.Pentax K20D , Ob. Pentax 80-200mm a 200mm , f/11 , 1/6sec. iso 100 , cavalletto.





What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on December 12, 2011 (18:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

fantastic colors

avatarjunior
sent on December 12, 2011 (21:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

sorry but what are you two Already in use layer masks with two or three selections? seems to be divided into several parts the picture! .. I really like it!

avatarsupporter
sent on December 12, 2011 (22:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful image, another one of your paintings.
Hello.

avatarsenior
sent on December 12, 2011 (22:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you all. For irisauro55: in this case I worked on two levels, one for the first quarter and the third quarter of photos, another level for the second quarter (the one with the smoke along the valley) and the background includes the sky. A decidedly desaturated (with some other device that I can not reveal for obvious reasons), and one a bit 'more saturated so as to give all good depth. And then of course with masks and brushes of different density pull out what I need. Hello and good photos at all :-)
I forgot one thing: in general this effect I can only picture in cloudy days and very flat light or twilight skies prevailing. In the pictures with clear skies and polished effect I have not yet put in place well and does not satisfy me at all.

avatarsupporter
sent on December 12, 2011 (23:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A beautiful landscape with a nice atmosphere.
A post in my opinion, totally inappropriate and excessive, but no more photography photo art.

avatarsenior
sent on December 12, 2011 (23:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Beppeverge. In my opinion, photography and fotoart are two shades of the same thing, who can claim the right to say where does one and the other begins? Thank you for your intervention. :-)

avatarsenior
sent on December 13, 2011 (0:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Sorry to disagree with your statement "... so as to give all good depth ..." 8-)
to do that you had to play the sky with a cool tone gradualizzando tones (from the first floor to warm up to colder) and not alternating, getting in fact have the opposite effect ...
will also be a fotoart, but for me it does not make much sense (at least according to what you said above) ..., it lacks a little 'more attention to components that sees some house cut in half ... :-D
Your research staff is admirable and courageous but sometimes, at least in my opinion, little studied.
Good experimentation and the next ;-)
Hello.

avatarsenior
sent on December 13, 2011 (0:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Some house cut is inevitable because there is a whole district that covers the hill. Move to set a different vantage point it was almost impossible since I was on a very limited viewpoint. If I tried not to include the houses on the right I ended up cutting up the hill on the right and the house with barn below. The sky was a beautiful deep red, having been taken just before sunset, I could not compromise its tonalità.Tu say that I got the opposite effect, however I think I got exactly what I was looking for points of view. The digressions whether photography or fotoart I leave to those who live according to the pattern set by some pseudoguro frustrated that needs to classify the world into categories in order to feel less useless. Hello to the next.

avatarsenior
sent on December 13, 2011 (11:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very peculiar colors and suitable for the type of shot. Excellent composition and the atmosphere is fantastic ...

Berry

avatarsupporter
sent on December 13, 2011 (12:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It will be ... ...: fconfuso: I like your pictures, but every time I see your post-treatment remain very puzzled ...: fconfuso: I do not see it the advantages that you pursue, but only an antique effect to areas such as in the old pictures ...
The fact remains that I find it right that everyone looking for their own way in photography, experimenting new paths in post processing and new expressions of this you'll appreciate this.

Hello, Alberto.

avatarsenior
sent on December 13, 2011 (13:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you all. I do not pretend to please, this forum is a simple space-sharing, and do not pretend that "understands" a photograph in the way I feel it, like a musical composition, it must be explained: may like it or not. Just do not find myself, at least at this time, the whole of those who see good photography only as a result of equipment on top of a photo absolutely free of grain (which is the first thing that I noticed when placed a photo ), the presence of a few dominant (second thing that I noticed) as if it were one of the most natural things in the world. That's why I'm cutting my own personal way of seeing things. I do not have the opportunity to travel a lot or buy equipment better than I possess; sure my landscapes, almost all of the Marche countryside, can not be the height of tropical forests, deserts of Africa or North America or exterminated spaces that abound in this forum. I do not claim anything unless you can show the world as I see it. Thanks again to everyone.

avatarjunior
sent on December 13, 2011 (16:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well said :-)

avatarsupporter
sent on December 14, 2011 (10:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

... that needs to classify the world into categories in order to feel less useless

.. I humbly apologize to the author of the picture if I'm allowed to comment negatively his work, from the tone that you used I understand that pleasing a lot more positive comments than negative ones, in the future I will only get you compliments.
Obviously they are not able to understand this photo, I know, I'm too closed and tied to rigid concepts of good photograph, perhaps exceeded.

Of course I did not expect to be so insulted for expressing a negative opinion, ok, I'm wrong, but you could make me see more tactfully.
I try to give my contribution to the forum struggling to find the negative aspects in the photographs that are available to comment, thinking that it is more useful to stimulate dialogue than just a "pretty picture", but the lack of moderation for this speech I suggests that perhaps mistake and that I deserved a harsh response and precise.
I reschest, as compared to the opinion of anyone who thinks differently from me, but they are not very sure that I can freely express my idea of ??a picture, I would not say other crap like the one I told you about this and take a ' other sound "peeled" from the forum, my already low self-esteem would sink into the abyss.

Again, sorry for my remarks unfortunate.

ps: I forgot to also apologize to the moderator for this OT.

avatarsenior
sent on December 14, 2011 (11:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I apologize to everyone for my actions enthusiasts, particularly Paolobisonni and Beppeverge. A Beppeverge the renewal because my intervention on the photographic category meant only to say that he had slipped in the view of some false prophet rather than join the world of photography or art or any other manifestation of human creativity, preferred share or marginalizing certain forms expression less responsive to traditional norms. Surely it was the wrong tone of my speech, and I ask again apologize. Hello and thanks again to everyone.

avatarsupporter
sent on December 14, 2011 (12:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

According to me ... Beppeverge should not apologize nor mortificarsi so, as Kramer71 not need to justify :-)
The question is very simple: Kramer71 has proposed an interpretation (because photography is always interpretation of reality, no matter how "likely") of this landscape and is satisfied with the result. That his work, shown here, meetings or not the taste and sensitivity of observers, is part of the game and should not be taken as an insult to their sensitivity or even to their ability to acquire some equipment ... First of all it is important that the photographer is satisfied with his work and if you want to be truly free, must not photograph only to meet the taste or the opinion of others ... But one thing I think is important: if the photo arouses in those who see the same emotions that led the photographer to achieve it, this is the meeting point between the two worlds.

Alberto.

avatarsenior
sent on December 05, 2013 (10:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

composition and processing as beautiful as I'm not a fan of photo "photoshopped", this, however, it is openly declared and the effect complesivo is pleasant for me ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on December 22, 2013 (18:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks to Alberto for his Cobr3tti and thought that I thoroughly enjoyed. I try to always bring something different to fossilizzarmi not a style. Sometimes I can, sometimes not. Certainly, in this picture you can see a lot of the '"artifice" and the intervention of photoshop may like or not. With the progress of time and changing tastes already, after only a few years before I found very pleasing photos that are now barely passable. There are no boundaries or comunqu, are very mobile, at least for me. Thanks again to all of you. :-)


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me