JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on January 30, 2014 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Willy ... :-D I will not pass to express the same concepts on all pictures of flowers that you have associated all'hashtag because they have defects "Serial" ... The composition. We reaffirm the rule of thirds. Do a quick search in the forums or on google ... Do you tend to put your subject in the center. It works only a few times ... :-D You should also pay attention to the times when photographers outside. Here you have the light lasts. You've clipped (blown, then lost details) highlights. If you had underexposed when shooting, you would have probably saved the details on the lights (but you'd also gotten a much darker in the less illuminated and especially in the shadows). If photographers in the next few hours at sunrise and sunset, or sun veiled, or completamentity in the shade / rain almost completely solve the problem ... Or for pictures of static subjects you throw on multiple exposures (one for lights, one for shadows, to be joined later in post-production) ... But let's take one step at a time ... Look out also for any disturbing elements that enter into the composition ... Although blurry, can ruin a photo ... ;-)
Hello. Andrea. ;-)
Ciao Willy... Non passerò ad esprimere gli stessi concetti su tutte le foto di fiori che hai associato all'hashtag, perché hanno dei difetti "Seriali"... La composizione. Ti ribadisco la regola dei terzi. Fai una ricerca veloce nel forum o su google... Tendi a mettere il soggetto al centro. Funziona pochissime volte... Ti consiglio anche di stare attento agli orari in cui fotografi all'aperto. Qui hai la luce dura. Hai clippato (bruciato, perso quindi dettagli) le alte luci. Se tu avessi sottoesposto durante lo scatto, avresti probabilmente salvato i dettagli sulle luci (ma avresti anche ottenuto un'immagine molto più scura nelle zone meno illuminate e soprattutto nelle ombre). Se fotografi negli orari prossimi all'alba e al tramonto, o con sole velato, o completamente in ombra/nuvoloso risolvi quasi completamente il problema... Oppure per foto a soggetti statici potresti buttarti sulle esposizioni multiple (una per le luci, una per le ombre, da unire poi in post produzione)... Ma facciamo un passo alla volta... Attento anche a eventuali elementi di disturbo che entrano nella composizione... Anche se sfocati, possono rovinarti una foto...
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
5.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
