What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 05, 2014 (11:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
compliments
complimenti
|
| sent on February 05, 2014 (16:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Lara!
Greetings, Mauritius Grazie Lara!
Un saluto, Maurizio |
| sent on June 04, 2014 (20:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful composition, light a star of the lighthouse adds something.
The lens you have used appeals to me, I'm undecided with zoom 8-16,
What do you think?
Beppe Bella composizione, la luce a stella del faro aggiunge qualcosa.
L'ottica che hai usato mi attira, sono indeciso con lo zoom 8-16,
che ne pensi ?
Beppe |
| sent on June 05, 2014 (0:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you also to Beppe here! :)
Look, in reality are very different, the 8-16 is a wide angle, fisheye not ... it depends on what you are looking for .. I confess that when taken with fisheye hand, opening up a world! But if you want to do landscaping etc. I recommend a wide angle. In this picture the lines are straight because I applied the correction profile with LR, but I have in this same gallery, the original version, and they are very different! Obviously the fisheye will never give the details of a wide angle ..
In my opinion you have two different perspectives! ;) You already had ideas on loans? Grazie mille anche di qui Beppe! :)
Guarda, in realtà sono molto diversi, l'8-16 è un grandangolare, non fisheye...dipende da quello che cerchi..ti confesso che una volta presa la mano col fisheye, ti si apre un mondo! Ma se vuoi fare paesaggistica ecc ti consiglio un grandangolo. In questa foto le linee sono dritte perché ho applicato la correzione profilo con LR, ma ho in questa stessa galleria la versione originale, e sono molto diverse! Ovviamente il fisheye non darà mai il dettaglio di un grandangolo..
A mio parere due ottiche diverse da avere! ;) avevi già idee sugli impieghi? |
| sent on June 05, 2014 (22:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have put up for sale a Tokina 12-24, I preferred the Nikon 16-85 that I find most versatile and a little sharper, both walk in the mountains around the city.
But I miss the most in mm wide angle to photograph landscapes and interiors of monuments, churches and museums.
They are more "documentary" that artist, perhaps as I write, my perspective is just the 8-16, my doubt arises because perhaps I'd use it mainly to 8 and a bit more brightness would be welcome.
Beppe Ho messo in vendita un Tokina 12-24, gli ho preferito il Nikon 16-85 che trovo più versatile e un pò più nitido, sia in passeggiata in montagna che in giro per la città.
Però mi mancano i mm in più del grandangolo per fotografare panorami e interni di monumenti, chiese o musei.
Sono più "documentarista" che artista, forse come mi scrivi tu, la mia ottica è proprio l'8-16, il mio dubbio nasce perchè forse la userei soprattutto a 8 e un pò più di luminosità sarebbe gradita.
Beppe |
| sent on June 06, 2014 (1:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In that case, you can then aim at a wide angle brighter, like the Tokina 11-16. You would always be a 2.8, but with the correction of the distortion that makes it more suitable to your style and your genres.
And maybe alongside a fisheye cheaper as the Samyang 8mm, with whom to get shots more details. Sure, you lose the automatic, but still a very good quality / price ratio and gives great satisfaction! ;)
Maurizio In quel caso potresti allora puntare ad un grandangolo più luminoso, come Il Tokina 11-16. Avresti sempre un 2.8, ma con la correzione della distorsione che lo rende più adatto al tuo stile e ai tuoi generi.
E magari affiancare un fisheye più economico come il Samyang 8mm, con cui ottenere scatti più particolari. Certo, perdi gli automatismi, ma ha comunque un ottimo rapporto qualità/prezzo e regala belle soddisfazioni! ;)
Maurizio |
| sent on September 02, 2014 (13:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Really a beautiful shot !!!
I like it !!! Davvero un bello scatto !!!
Mi piace !!! |
| sent on September 02, 2014 (14:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nikcola Thanks, glad you enjoyed!
Hello,
Maurizio Grazie Nikcola, felice ti sia piaciuta!
Ciao,
Maurizio |
user59947 | sent on February 11, 2017 (20:53) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful! |
| sent on February 12, 2017 (16:45) | This comment has been translated
Thanks a lot! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
13.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
