4 Weddings | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Portrait and Fashion

Resize to fit window

Canon 100 macro Is vs. sfocato View gallery (16 photos)

4 Weddings sent on December 10, 2011 (23:01) by Prof Chaos. 4 comments, 1101 views.

, 1/15 f/2.8, ISO 400,

Canon 7D, Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM, 400 iso, 1/16 sec, f/2.8

10 persons like it: Afrikachiara, Barone, Claudio Salari, Franco Marciandi, Gianna Franco, Giuliost, Ikhnusa78, Jazzbozz, Milleunanotte, Pippopoint

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Elleemme

sent on December 12, 2011 (20:31)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Buona l'idea del doppio ritratto frontale su due piani. Come interpretazione personale avrei incluso le 2 orecchie ai lati e alzato gli iso per ridurre il micromosso. Nella lista delle spesa consiglio pannelli riflettenti per ritratti da 80cm e più ;-)

ciao e buona luce, lauro

Good idea of ??the double portrait front on two floors. As personal interpretation I would have included the 2 ears on the sides and up the ISO to reduce blur. In the list of council spending reflectors for portraits 80cm and more ;-) hello and good light, laurel

Prof Chaos

sent on December 13, 2011 (10:17)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Grazie del passaggio, lm.
Pensa che prima di postare questa foto, mi ero detto: "vedrai che qualcuno mi contesterà il taglio delle orecchie..." ;-)

E' una scelta, che può essere infelice, o da qualcuno potrebbe essere letta come coraggiosa...
Probabilmente, se prima di postare mi sono fatto l'autoosservazione, la scelta è infelice...

Tutte le foto di questa galleria sono state fatte cercando la spontaneità dei soggetti. Non mi sarei potuto permettere di
utilizzare pannelli di alcun genere.

Trovo che un ritratto come questo, scattato a manolibera ad 1/16sec, sia emblematico di alcune capacità intrinseche della lente.
Ed essendo un ritratto, non sia così preponderante l'aspetto del leggero micromosso... Ma questa è la mia opinione...

Ciaociao...

Thanks for the ride, lm.
Do you think before you post this picture, I said to myself: "you'll see that someone would contest the cropping of ears ..." ;-)
It 'sa choice that can be unhappy, or someone could be read as brave ...
Probably, if I have done before posting self-observation, the choice is unhappy ...

All photos in this gallery were made looking for the spontaneity of the subject. I would not have been able to afford to
use panels of any kind.

I find that a portrait like this, started to freehand to 1/16sec, is emblematic of some inherent capabilities of the lens.
And being a portrait, it is not so overwhelming the look of slight shake ... But this is my opinion ...

Ciaociao ...

Elleemme

sent on December 14, 2011 (15:29)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

comprendo la tua posizione ma ti ricordo che il pannello non è invadente e anzi ti permetteva di avere più margine operativo . Avere una persona davanti a loro e una con pannello a lato non avrebbero influito sulla spontanietà se si sa interagire.
Piuttosto di vedere le orecchie tagliate ho provato ad escuderle in modo da avvicinare ancora i soggetti, ora lo sguardo è completamente veicolato sul piccolo e successivamente sul padre senza distrazioni...

Ciao, lauro

I understand your position but I remind you that the panel is not intrusive and actually allowed you to have multiple operating margin. Having a person in front of them and one side panel would not affect the spontaneity if you know interact.
Rather than see cropped ears I tried to escuderle so as to approach the subject again, now the look is completely conveyed to the small and then the father without distractions ...

Hello, laurel

Franco Marciandi

sent on February 12, 2012 (16:10)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

orgoglio di padre (con o senza orecchie)!

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.