Untitled Photo | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Birds

Resize to fit window

Uccelli View gallery (21 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on December 10, 2011 (18:19) by Maxiben. 20 comments, 1280 views.

1/320 f/10.0, ISO 200, Specie: Erithacus rubecula

Il mio primo Pettirosso... D300S e 500 F4 1/320 @ f10

5 persons like it: Andrea61, Eragon, Lexis29, Luigi Bassi, S.sabbat

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Pixelxpixel

sent on December 10, 2011 (18:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Compliments beautiful framing, and also the expression of the subject. the 500 f4 which brand is?

Maxiben

sent on December 10, 2011 (18:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Nikkor, hello and thank you

Franco Giannattasio

sent on December 10, 2011 (18:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful and clear, you were very close?

Maxiben

sent on December 10, 2011 (18:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Definitely, nn só program that used to have this as the way I find very important, however-of-thumb about 5/6 mt. Hello

Berna

sent on December 10, 2011 (18:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very beautiful.

Spanu Luigi

sent on December 10, 2011 (19:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful, great detail, beautiful colors.

Jogas

sent on December 10, 2011 (19:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

“ Nice and sharp „

Short view ... "firepower" available, one might expect something more.
the eye is not quite in focus, the background is a bit disturbed ...
Juza says at the beginning of the

“ a "beautiful picture!" pleased, but a thorough review is much more useful „

greetings
Joseph

Maxiben

sent on December 10, 2011 (19:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks are convinced that an appreciation of pleasure ago, I personally appreciate the comments also reveal imperfections or defects improved. In this particular case, as you can see from the data I tried shooting the maximum depth possible shooting at 1/320 maybe I could close some diaphragm + and raise the ISO. For the firepower I assure you that is not decisive here you can see photos taken with glasses less "performing" far beyond my ..... but these are not what is the electronic medium but the handle and I still have a long way to do it that way. As for the background sincerely nn I find it so intrusive as to interfere, I like to see a minimum of background .... enhances the roost. Hello and thank you for your intervention.

Maxiben

Franco Giannattasio

sent on December 10, 2011 (20:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Since I was the one to say:

“ Nice and sharp „

.
I do not change my mind for sure, sharpness else and as you can see even the texture of the feathers, and also beautiful with the colors so perfect, it seems to be able to touch this robin.
I find it very humble speech Maxiben:

“ For the firepower I assure you that is not relevant here you can see photos taken with glasses less "performing" far beyond me ..... but these are not what is the electronic medium but the handle and I still a long way to go in that direction „

The background does not interfere at all in fact we note that in a natural environment without a background processed.
So think before you say:

“ "short view" firepower " „

that does not make sense to me.
The best photographers have also used the compact:-D
Sorry Jogas I have not found a girlfriend in your gallery, belonging to the Swan burned with 300mm 2.8.

Enrico

sent on December 10, 2011 (21:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Great photos ;-)

Mmulinai

sent on December 10, 2011 (21:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

regarding the distance that simply uses "bridge" of photoshop and metadata of the raw'll find the distance to the subject, going to shoot is not the speed that contributes to the pdc but the diaphragm, cmq not close 500 to f10 because you risk a strong diffraction affect the sharpness, also even 1/320 of a subject as nervous as many birds are not enough to freeze the motion, tries to direct the focal point at least on the head and you will slowly reach good results actually ... the optical pemetterà you better results ... Hello

Pallotta Luigi

sent on December 10, 2011 (21:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

very nice

Vonscatt

sent on December 10, 2011 (21:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I love it. Warm and expressive. Great detail. If this is the beginning, well take me with you. Perch not STAGE. Bravo. Sergio von Scatt

Ollen

sent on December 10, 2011 (22:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Great photos .. the best focus falls mainly on the body and given the close proximity of the diaphragm does not have benefited quite closed, in these cases, a MAF selective or direct it to the most important part of the eye, I often work with the 600mm and often encounter this problem. . With this subject need to be careful with the saturation of the red-breasted otherwise "kneaded" by removing all the details must be checked in a selective way, leaving unchanged the rest of the photo.

Mmulinai: With regard to the distance that simply uses "bridge" of photoshop and metadata of the raw find the distance to the subject,

Here's a demonstration ... Give yourself shooting detected with Adobe Bridge CS4
Nikon D300s, Serial No. 6059320, F. 10.0, 1/320s, -0.33, ISO 200, 500mm Optical, considering the multiplying factor of the sensor equiv.750mm, distance living room. 4.2 m, light source = cloud, creation date 07/12/2011, hours 12,50,10 sec. Manual White Balance, etc. .. hello In

Jogas

sent on December 11, 2011 (1:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Maxiben
Thank you for your explanation, I think the spirit of the forum to exchange views and opinions, I see hundreds of "beautiful", "beautiful", "congratulations", etc..
perhaps it is so easy to answer because it increases the number of messages sent and the "importance" in the forum?
@ Franco
I do not want to change your mind, everybody thinks, judges and sees with his head.
Thank you for your comment on my photo "burned" at least someone has expressed an opinion :)
Regarding the sharpness, share 100% what has been written previously by Ollen
as regards the "firepower", I think it's a little difficult to make a picture like that with a compact, I at least there I could ..
greetings
Joseph

Maxiben

sent on December 11, 2011 (9:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Jogas go quiet I place the photos in the comment because I would like to receive your comments and your opinions, with this system I was able to learn many things. Now that I explained it well I agree with them for them ...... At no idea that f10 was not enough to make everything in focus and I focused on the body. It was very fast came just rested for a while and flew away. With regard to the comment on your photos, I think you should throw yourself into the fray and post without presumptions of being able to force, the results will come slowly, one picture is a little 'bit :-) On the other hand if you two Conticini yourself to the power of fire jokes 300 + 1.7 = 510 which multiplied by the fac. Magnification of the sensor are 765 mm. You do not fossilize on the equipment up early in the morning and go to shoot here we talk about passion and if you have it you have fun with a compact.

Hello Massimiliano

Ollen

sent on December 11, 2011 (9:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Back on the subject because downloading the file of the photo (395byte format ipg., Then compressed and worked) I made small changes, fast and thus approximate for illustrative purposes only, with PS4.
In my personal opinion, the shot is well made and improved by recovering the details reported, some with the original file would be something else ...
I attach link:
img210.imageshack.us/img210/4357/gal1615m.jpg
I hope I was helpful! In a salute

Maxiben

sent on December 11, 2011 (10:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In're an artist like you did? have got a lot of detail in the eye and the background even if I nn disturbs the other way so it is actually less "intrusive", thank you very much for taking your time to me .. Thank you Thank hello

Franco_63

sent on December 11, 2011 (16:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice ;-)

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.