Caterpillar | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

3.8 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Macro View gallery (3 photos)

Caterpillar sent on January 25, 2014 (20:31) by Gigidoc962. 4 comments, 622 views.

, 1/125 f/7.1, ISO 200, tripod.

View High Resolution 3.8 MP

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Pigi47

sent on January 26, 2014 (14:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Not bad focus, but the light was to be distributed in the best way, maybe helping with a panel, or with a shot of filling.

Gigidoc962

sent on January 26, 2014 (15:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

thanks pigi are the first macro, I will try to take advantage of the advice

Maurow

sent on January 26, 2014 (18:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The shadows are very annoying, and, among other things, make losing the legibility of the back.
Also the overall sharpness is not accurate, in particular as regards the head (on the other hand, the position of the larva did not make things easier ...).

In my opinion it is Arge ochropus.

Gigidoc962

sent on January 26, 2014 (18:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

thanks for the technical advice and the opinion on the species
gigi

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.