Now you prick | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

Resize to fit window

Macro View gallery (11 photos)

Now you prick sent on January 23, 2014 (23:05) by Roberto Corradetti. 3 comments, 516 views.

, 1/100 f/10.0, ISO 2500, hand held.

3 persons like it: Ivan73, Massimiliano Montemagno, Scap73

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 257000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Pigi47

sent on January 24, 2014 (11:24)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

La maf sembrerebbe posticipata considerando che l'occhio appare meno nitido rispetto al torace, il quale risulta essere con valori di luminosità al limite della sovraesposizione.
Meglio utilizzare il crop solo per sistemare la composizione, non certo per aumentare il rapporto di riproduzione, altro non faresti che aumentare i problemi esistenti.
Attento in fase di ripresa a non tagliuzzare in questo modo il posatoio, un passo indietro e tutto sarebbe rientrato nel fotogramma.
Bene si è comportata la fotocamera considerando la sensibilità usata.

The maf would appear delayed whereas the eye appears less sharp than the chest, which turns out to be with brightness values ??at the edge of overexposure.
Better to use the crop just to set the composition, not to increase the ratio, nothing that would increase the existing problems.
Being careful not to shoot shred the roost in this way, step back and everything would be back in the frame.
Well behaved considering the sensitivity of the camera used.

Massimiliano Montemagno

sent on January 24, 2014 (11:25)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Poco buona la Maf sulla testa, non mi convince la composizione.

Shortly good Maf on the head, I am not convinced the composition.

Roberto Corradetti

sent on January 24, 2014 (12:19)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

ho provato a fotografare la vespa con tre tubi di prolunga abbinati al 90 macro,senza cavalletto. grazie della visita e consigli.

I tried to photograph the wasp with three extension tubes combined with the 90 macro, without a tripod. thanks for your visit and advice.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.