What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 08, 2011 (22:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Technically very good with good control of the white cheek, photographic biggest problem with this subject, and nice background. Too bad for the ring! Tecnicamente molto valida con buon controllo del bianco della guancia, maggior problema fotografico con questo soggetto, e sfondo gradevole. Peccato per l'anello! |
| sent on December 09, 2011 (11:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Even for me is a nice shot, we are not jealous .... if she is married patience:-P Anche x me è un bello scatto, non siamo gelosi.... se è sposata pazienza |
| sent on December 09, 2011 (11:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice composition, the background, the roost and the point of recovery. Some areas of tit seem pasty, the guanciotta no detail (perhaps due to the shake of the person singing). As personal interpretation I underexposed at least 1/3 stop and closed more the diaphragm is to emphasize the pdc that the sharpness but I do not know if you had margin: fconfuso:. Can you give more technical data click next to the title as a reflex, objective, time esp., Num.F., program shutter, ISO, focal length, exposure val.di deviation, flash? These provide useful information to other users allows them to enter into the spirit of better picture posted and understand your options in the stage of pre-release as well as allow us to make a more reasoned and objective comment. hello and good light, laurel Piacevoli la composizione, lo sfondo, il posatoio e il punto di ripresa. Alcune zone della cinciallegra mi sembrano pastose, la guanciotta non ha dettaglio (forse a causa del micromosso del soggetto canterino). Come interpretazione personale avrei sottoesposto almeno di 1/3 di stop e chiuso di più il diaframma sia per enfatizzare la pdc che la nitidezza ma non so se avevi margine . Puoi fornirci sempre i dati tecnici di scatto a fianco del titolo come reflex,obiettivo, tempo esp.,num.F., programma di scatto, iso, focale, val.di deviazione esposizione, flash ? Fornire questi elementi utili agli altri utenti permette loro di entrare meglio nello spirito della fotografia postata e comprendere le tue scelte nella fase del pre-scatto oltre a permetterci di fare un commento più ragionato e oggettivo. ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on December 09, 2011 (12:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A nice photo. Una bella foto. |
| sent on December 09, 2011 (18:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice maybe a little overexposed the anellated the subject is an added value and not a defect in fact bella forse un filo sovresposta l'anellazione del soggetto è un valore aggiunto e non un difetto anzi |
| sent on December 09, 2011 (20:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all, here is the shooting data Nikon D7000 nikkor 300 2.8 (AF-I) + TC 17 f9 1/640, Aperture-priority automatic reading semispoot. crop 60% Grazie a tutti, ecco i dati di scatto Nikon D7000 nikkor 300 2.8 (AF-I) + TC 17 f9 1/640, automatismo a priorità di apertura lettura semispoot. crop 60% |
| sent on December 09, 2011 (21:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well France ... 1/640sec. proved to be a little Pochini: fconfuso: beh France ... 1/640sec. si sono rivelati un pò pochini |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |