At 2500 meters above sea level

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

17.9 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Paesaggi View gallery (2 photos)

At 2500 meters above sea level sent on January 19, 2014 (23:18) by Laurai1978. 3 comments, 1149 views.

, 1/1250 f/9.0, ISO 100, hand held.

View High Resolution 17.9 MP

2 persons like it: Kelvs, Nikispinnato

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Paolo Viviani

sent on January 20, 2014 (10:11)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Atmosfera interessante dai bei toni caldi, a gusto personale trovo che quell'hot spot distragga troppo e pare aggiunto in post produzione o sbaglio?

Un saluto

Interesting atmosphere by the beautiful warm tones to personal taste I find that quell'hot spot distract too much and seems to be added in post production, or am I wrong?

Greetings

Docedo

sent on January 20, 2014 (11:40)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

quoto Paolo. bella e rilassante ma la luce verrebbe da destra e quel punto abbaglia.
ciao

quoto Paul. nice and relaxing but the light would come from the right and then dazzles.
hello

Laurai1978

sent on January 20, 2014 (11:55)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

" aggiunto in post produzione o sbaglio"

Ciao Paolo ti ringrazio della visita, si hai ragione è stato aggiunto in pp, ed è stato aggiunto a mio modo di vedere l'immagine per distrarre da quella zona e concentrarsi a guardare sulla parte destra del fotogramma, a mio modo era per cercare di dare un punto preciso di osservazione dell'immagine, ed anche perchè la parte sinistra della foto la trovo poco interessante.
Però ti do ragione ho esagerato, l'inesperienza nella pp :D
Docedo grazie anche a te per il passaggio :D

“ added in post production or mistake „

Hello Paul thank you for the visit, you're right was added in PP, and was added to my way of seeing the picture to distract from that area and focus to look at the right side of the frame, as I was trying to give a precise point of picture viewing, and also because the left side of the photo I find uninteresting.
But I agree with you I exaggerated, inexperience in pp: D
Docedo thanks to you for the pass: D

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.