What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user6249 | sent on December 08, 2011 (15:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
pretty ok but the reasoning mark2 iso-comq it was better with a diaphragm 11 to 16, iso lower with a corresponding adaptation of the shutter ...... from 1/8000 to fall avoglia bella ma ok il ragionamento mark2-iso comq forse era meglio con un diaframma da 11 a 16, iso più bassi con relativo adeguamento del tempo di posa......da 1/8000 avoglia a scendere |
| sent on December 08, 2011 (20:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not understand your reasoning regarding the aperture f11-f16 ... it is not a landscape where frame it an area that extends from 0.5m to infinity. In this photo almost all, if not all, is already to infinity, and therefore it is better to shoot better than the diaphragm (which would specifically f5.6) Ok quit a bit, but f11-f16 seems a little too much. That being said the picture was taken from a boat, so I had a few seconds to compose and shoot. Cmq Thanks for your opinion :) Non capisco il tuo ragionamento per quanto riguarda il diaframma f11-f16...non si tratta di un paesaggio dove inquadro un'area che va da 0.5m a infinito. In questa foto quasi tutto, se non proprio tutto è gia ad infinito e quindi conviene scattare al diaframma migliore dell'obiettivo (che nello specifico sarebbe f5.6) Ok chiudere un pò, ma f11-f16 mi sembra un pò troppo. Detto questo la foto è stata fatta da un battello e pertanto ho avuto pochi secondi per comporre e scattare. Grazie cmq per la tua opinione :) |
user6249 | sent on December 08, 2011 (21:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
imagine :) figurati :) |
| sent on December 08, 2011 (21:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ninth stop! I would like to know your point of view on my opinion, just to see if I reason well or is there some crack :) Nono ferma! vorrei sapere il tuo punto di vista sulla mia opinione, giusto per capire se ragiono bene o c'è qualche crepa :) |
user6249 | sent on December 08, 2011 (21:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
my opinion is just a point of view is important and I respect that shot I mailed the diaphragm 11 200th time I went well (then you have to be la) and ISO accordingly to balance raw sun (or in the case of car, and I think thus, making shots on the fly here and conditions change.)
Regarding your opinion lottica do not know specifically but I think the "best" aperture of any lens is between 9 and 11 è semplicemente una opinione il mio punto di vista conta relativamente ed io quello scatto lo impostavo a diaframma 11 tempo a 200esimo andava credo bene (poi bisogna stare la) ed iso di conseguenza in raw bilanciamento sole (o su auto nel caso, e credo sia cosi, facendo scatti al volo qua e la le condizioni cambiano.)
Riguardo la tua opinione non conosco lottica specificatamente ma credo che il "miglior" diaframma di qualsiasi ottica sta tra 9 e 11 |
| sent on December 08, 2011 (22:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Your speech clarity is flawless in general (for aps-c sensors to better f9 to f11 to full frame) when you do not know the context, but I did some tests on 70-200 (involuntary) and I noted that for f5.6-6.3 is sharper (we talk about things imperceptible if not 100%). That said, shooting in raw balance I am in post and the shutter agree :)
Thanks again ;) good night! Il tuo discorso per la nitidezza non fa una piega in generale (per sensori aps-c meglio verso f9, per full frame verso f11) quando non si conosce l'ottica, ma sul 70-200 ho fatto qualche test (involontario) e ho notato che per f5.6-6.3 è più nitido (si parla di cose impercettibili se non al 100%). Detto questo, scattando in raw del bilanciamento me ne occupo in post e per il tempo di scatto condivido :)
Ti ringrazio ancora ;) buona serata! |
user6249 | sent on December 09, 2011 (0:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
you a te |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
