RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Portrait and Fashion
  4. » Sofia emmeelle

 
Sofia emmeelle...

Sofia

View gallery (3 photos)

Sofia emmeelle sent on January 18, 2014 (16:26) by Falconfab. 26 comments, 1977 views.

, 1/500 f/5.6, ISO 100, hand held.

#RitrattiBimbi #Bokeh Questa è una delle mie foto migliori fatta a 116mm. Ringrazio per i consigli già avuti. Taglio proposto da elleemme.





PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 244000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2014 (17:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Let's face it ... This story of the # CircoloFotografico has a little 'tired ...
:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D

So, for me it does not work very composition.
I saw you the like, but I prefer this one, which had already proposed:
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=633188&l=it
There are Cuboni (which still did not give it bother), and I think you have perhaps forgotten to apply the MDC
(Otherwise I would not know ... The lens does not shine for some clarity and have worked with a 116mm aperture a bit 'open af/8-f/11 maybe you'd have more sharpness, compared with an increase of pdc).
I like the look is not addressed in the room and apprice even the shadow on his face, which gives a more natural clicks.


It 'pretty picture, but I do not think will come back in the future (it is not a masterpiece, in short, imho ...
I'm exaggerating?).
Beautiful baby girl ... ;-)
Hello.






avatarjunior
sent on January 18, 2014 (17:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Falconfab,

Very intense expression of Sofia but ..
The eyes. I find it not very pleasant the difference of lighting between the two. They are the distinctive part of this and so they should, according to me, have the same importance and enhancement. The left eye instead I find it too sacrificed. Today I find myself having to defend a format that generally do not like the square one.
In a few seconds after I lightened the shadows and made a square cut. Although the relationship between the sides of the 1:1 image is too "central" I will horrify the purists but also tries to reflect it horizontally with the look of Sofia in "exit" that is, toward the right. In my gains further
Opinions questionable.
ps if someone tells me how to do my own version, I might add, if it is ever moreacere.

Angel

user14286
avatar
sent on January 18, 2014 (17:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Unfortunately I have to usher in the vein of slating ... :-D

Despite the undeniable photogenic Sofia, I find the photo lacks any force that can be characterized as a portrait.
I am not convinced the cut, I am not convinced the light, I am not convinced the expression educated, and is also affected by shake-visible ... well, for me, photos to be redone. ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2014 (18:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Great! finally beginning to see things that do not go. Because, although I really like this photo, I knew that something was not working because I was "tired" after a few visions. I posted just to see what it was!
It does not have the ambition to be a masterpiece and, although I thank you for the compliments to my daughter, she is beautiful ... like all children of this age! ;-) On the cut, composition, aperture nothing to say. I understand all the limitations of the photographer and the equipment :-|
Some clarification, the photo has not undergone any PP except the cut made by ElleEmme. So even an unsharp mask (if I understand what it is). Indeed, it seems to me, being in my first tests of a year ago that I shot directly in jpg. The expression is not cultivated partsparticularly nice :-) I was hoping that the originality compessasse :-)

one thing, however, of all the just criticism, I did not understand ... where you see the shake-? I do not see it, but if at 1/500, with a view stabilized, are not "safe" there is something that I did not understand ... pls help me! : Fconfuso:

Thank you all for the transition, comments and criticisms! :-D


avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2014 (18:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'm not an expert but I follow a lot of portraits interested in the interesting comments. Even though I do not see the shake-it is not that they are not all in focus (I can not tell if the left eye of the "model":-D is in focus or not to speak) seems in some parts, in fact, a picture with shake-? I ask as we learn at least two ...

angelob for:

Go to: imageshack.com /
After you have registered and are logged in, you can upload your photo (UPLOAD) it is also selecting the size of your liking.
When you have finished loading the image copy the DIRECT LINK (by default offers you that). Finally here on a message crush space between the brackets and IMG enter the Direct Connect.
Save the comment asusual .... and voila, the game is done ;-)
If you have problems are at your disposal! :-P
(Copied verbatim from the suggestion by another user, and had I made my own:-D)
hello Massimo

user14286
avatar
sent on January 18, 2014 (18:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

There are areas just as the aforementioned left eye but also between sup lip and nose, or hair to the right (left in the photo) that appear less sharp than the rest. At f/5.6 the pdc does not justify a difference in focus between the right and left eye, for example ...
could also be due to involuntary movements, eg. was winking, lip beating the cold and more ...
All this, however, not to make unnecessarily fleas to the photo, but to say that camera shake is still there, and that the times are not a guarantee of absolute security!

cm ² if you just want to remove the curiosity enough to observe shooting at full resolution.

user14286
avatar
sent on January 18, 2014 (18:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Angelob: You must include the link in [IMG][/IMG]

avatarjunior
sent on January 18, 2014 (18:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Repro



avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2014 (18:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Sure Poison, I noticed that what you write, what I was wondering is: are shake-or out of focus?
I do not know how far away he was when shooting and this is what focal length was taken: this does?
Because if you look at the hair and right ear are not in focus, as well as on the left (as opposed to in the photo).
Always to understand, do not know yet what exact difference there between steps a and a shake-fuorifuoco as in this case.
hello

avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2014 (19:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Poison, this has got to stop! I'll see you out and not present at a meeting in focus with a simple knife! :-D:-D:-D

I believe that it is not shake-I looked at the larger picture, and I think it is the blur. However, the pdc is surprisingly low if you think I took only 117mm.

interesting also cut proposed by angel :-) In fact, the square cut, sometimes make sense. Probably also depends on the fact that in that way it enhances the only element of interest.

Tomorrow I take the picture and replace it with another! Of course, first, I will copy the criticism of the original photo.
Thanks to todos (especially to poison).

avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2014 (19:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I think the cut is too tight, but mostly it is just in context, then the sub-fund "technique", I would just repeat what others have already written so I limit myself to exhibit the most obvious thing that I noticed ;-)

user14286
avatar
sent on January 18, 2014 (20:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Massimobonini:
The shake-is due to a micro movement of the machine (or subject) at the time of the shot, the more sensitive as the slower the shutter speed. Resulting in lack of sharpness of the whole or part of the image.
The "out of focus" is instead due to an error of the focus, which falls on an image plane different from that desired, and is much more sensitive than the lower the pdc (which in turn depends on the opening and focal) . Resulting in a lack of clarity concerning sun areas that fall outside the focal plane.
In cases of doubt, only the observation of the image at full resolution can allow you to understand what exactly the problem.

avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2014 (20:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Even here premise: the portrait is not my thing and I know little. So I go to feeling.
The frame is very tight, but there may also be given the beauty of the subject. But at this point, instead of "skin" your head up, or they were trying to avoid the small cut, or if they work a stronger compression lower. As it stands only gives me the idea of ??a composition error.
Regarding the cut, I think the version provided by Angelob value it very much, as well as the reversal of the image.
With regard to the question of the shake-/ out of focus, as mentioned by others, you should have full resolution to understand this better, but the nose so I would say that it is more out of focus.
The proximity to the subject and the lunghezza, focal added to the APSC sensor of the camera body creates, in my view, a reduced pdc which also creates a pleasant blurred in the background, even though the equipment is not to be "defocused magic" ;-)
Hello
Barbara

edit: as I spoke I watched the cut shooting revised and corrected by Angelob, which must have worked on another shoot. That thread object has a decided edge over the other. Sorry for the oversight.

avatarjunior
sent on January 18, 2014 (21:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Yes, of course I went on the original shot posted by falconfab otherwise indicated a crop of the crop of the crop ..

avatarsenior
sent on January 19, 2014 (19:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Guys, thanks to all of the passage and valuable criticism. Remove this photo from # circolofotografico to insert another one. In a few days I will remove the photo but its not until you have copied the comments on the original photo.

avatarsupporter
sent on January 22, 2014 (0:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Why will remove the photo?
The criticisms are always constructive you've got a great start and I like this picture with its flaws.
Hello to the next
Mark :-)

avatarsenior
sent on January 22, 2014 (0:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Mark. We remove two, but I leave one :) I've published various versions to practice :)
But first I have to save the comments because they are a small wealth :)

Me too, in spite of everything like I made it after all :) ... and I do not mean to shoot ;)

avatarsupporter
sent on January 22, 2014 (0:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

So congratulations are higher and your creature that you LIKE a lot.
You know as well as I photograph are a grandparent.

Hello Marco

Ps with 2 eyes so I would like to see only the big shots

avatarsenior
sent on March 16, 2015 (22:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well done, congratulations :)

avatarsenior
sent on March 17, 2015 (18:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Mark, Thanks Bambi! :-D




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me