What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 07, 2011 (17:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
take my dominated magenta, for the rest only applause and "emotion"
toglierei la dominate magenta, per il resto solo applausi e "commozione"
|
| sent on December 07, 2011 (18:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful, but they are two or four? compliments bellissima, ma sono due o quattro? complimenti |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (18:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nooo, they are fake, say it! Nooo, sono finti, dillo! |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (18:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Definitely a beautiful image components and position of the subjects.
In my opinion, however, is strongly penalized by the move.
hello Sicuramente una bella immagine per compo e posizione dei soggetti.
A mio avviso però è penalizzata fortemente dal mosso.
ciao |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (18:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very good to speculate composition of subjects with its reflection, I do not see it move, snipe on left is sharp and the other is out of the pdc because on another floor. molto bella per composizione speculare dei soggetti con relativo riflesso,io non la vedo mossa,il beccaccino di sx è nitido l'altro è fuori dalla pdc perchè su un'altro piano. |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (19:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I was in a position so uncomfortable that I could not focus on the subject's right, that 'more' and how close would be more 'correct for a greater pdc, third two thirds thanks for the comment stavo in una posizione talmente scomoda che non riuscivo a mettere a fuoco il soggetto di destra ,che e' piu' vicino e come sarebbe piu' corretto per una maggiore pdc, un terzo due terzi grazie per il commento |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (19:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Healthy envy envy .... ....
Congratulations, Paul Invidia....sana invidia....
Complimenti, paolo |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (20:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Apparently it is a beautiful image ......
But, look closely, you will notice that it lacks clarity .... :-| Apparentemente è una bellissima immagine......
Però , guardando bene, si nota che manca di nitidezza.... |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (20:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
More that are not clearly second is to focus on the wrong subject, if the focus had been made on the subject closest would be a great shot, so it's "only" a good picture. Più che mancare di nitidezza secondo è a fuoco il soggetto sbagliato, se la messa a fuoco fosse stata fatta su soggetto più vicino sarebbe stato uno scatto eccezionale, così è "solo" una bella foto. |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (20:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
quoto bern Mark and Antonio
But remember that it is always a nice picture ;-) quoto berna marco e tonio
però ricordati che è sempre una bella foto  |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (20:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
a nice picture though not very sharp una bella foto anche se non molto nitida |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (20:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice although the first subject could be more focus on the eye. Molto bella anche se il primo soggetto poteva essere più a fuoco sull'occhio. |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (21:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful compliments. Bellissima complimenti. |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (21:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto Pelao83 Quoto Pelao83 |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (21:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A nice photo! Una bella foto!! |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (21:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like the point of recovery and the time read. As personal interpretation you have given more water and under svoaesposto at least 1/3 stop. You did not press the shutter and iso used ... margin had to close the iris to F.8 and emphasize the pdc and sharpness?
hello and good light, laurel Mi piacciono il punto di ripresa e il momento colto. Come interpretazione personale avrai dato più acqua sotto e svoaesposto almeno di 1/3 di stop. Non ci hai comunicato il tempo di scatto e gli iso usati ... avevi margine per chiudere il diaframma a f.8 ed enfatizzare la pdc e la nitidezza?
ciao e buona luce,lauro |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
is already so if I see one .. you and me two photographers and even reflections.
excellent composition. quoto the light moved and shame that you could not focus on the closer. è già tanto se ne vedo uno.. e tu me ne fotografi 2 e pure riflessi.
ottima composizione. quoto il leggero mosso e peccato che non hai potuto puntare sul più vicino. |
| sent on December 07, 2011 (22:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Double win ...... I see not very clear on the subject of equal right ........ very nice:-P Bella doppietta......vedo non molto nitido il soggetto di destra........molto bella uguale |
| sent on December 08, 2011 (8:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If the subject was right to fire would be a masterpiece! So, the photo is penalized, because the subject has left the eye more in the shade and the light behind him, in addition to being far away ... just there was no way to focus on the other, using one of lateral points?
For the rest, the show seems so good, because some parts of the subject seem to have the right to limit (but the light conditions did not help, you have material to the exploited very well!).
Hello
David Se il soggetto di destra fosse stato a fuoco sarebbe stato un capolavoro!!! Così, la foto è penalizzata, perché il soggetto di sinistra ha l'occhio più in ombra e la luce alle spalle, oltre ad essere più lontano...proprio non c'era modo per mettere a fuoco l'altro, usando uno dei punti laterali??
Per il resto, l'esposizione mi sembra buona così, anche perché alcune parti del soggetto di destra sembrano già al limite (ma le condizioni di luce non ti hanno aiutato, nzi le hai sfruttate molto bene!!).
Ciao
Davide |
| sent on December 08, 2011 (9:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The view is great, then shows some imperfections (already mentioned), it is enviable image. compliments
see you soon Il colpo d'occhio è notevole, poi emergono alcune imperfezioni (già segnalate), resta un'immagine invidiabile. complimenti
a presto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
