What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 08, 2014 (14:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
brilliant! geniale !! |
| sent on February 08, 2014 (14:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To achieve that definitely:-D Per realizzarla sicuramente  |
| sent on May 16, 2014 (11:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations you have a great eye!! :-D Complimenti hai davvero occhio!!!! |
| sent on May 16, 2014 (14:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
An eye so big! Un occhio grosso così! |
user41490 | sent on May 19, 2014 (10:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You're practically a genius! Wow! Sei un genio praticamente! |
| sent on May 19, 2014 (11:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You do what you can:-D Si fa quel che si può |
| sent on July 02, 2014 (14:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ntavissimo and beautiful macro ntavissimo e bellissima macro |
| sent on July 02, 2014 (23:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thank you so much luca :-) grazie mille luca |
| sent on September 12, 2014 (12:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations! I have a couple of questions: how did you manage to avoid the blur of the eye due to flash? and that you had your eye away from the objective?
Congratulations again!
Greetings
Vincenzo Complimenti! Avrei un paio di domande: come hai fatto per evitare il mosso dell'occhio dovuto ai flash? e a che distanza avevi l'occhio dall'obbiettivo?
Ancora complimenti!
Saluti
Vincenzo |
| sent on September 12, 2014 (13:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Colibri hello, thanks for the compliments:-) well at 1/200 the time is fast enough not to be camera shake, and the eye was close enough, about 20cm maybe less ciao Colibri, grazie per i complimenti beh a 1/200 il tempo è abbastanza veloce da non far comparire il micromosso, e l'occhio era abbastanza vicino, circa 20cm forse meno |
| sent on January 19, 2015 (18:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
More detailed so you can not! Più dettagliata di così non si può! |
| sent on January 19, 2015 (21:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
so detailed and realistic that if you touch the screen feel it:-D:-D così dettagliata e realistica che se tocchi lo schermo lo sento |
| sent on March 18, 2015 (15:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent photo, but to get the most detail from the eyes, the flash should be pointed sideways, and not the front. Ottima foto, tuttavia per ottenere il massimo dettaglio dagli occhi, il flash dovrebbe essere puntato lateralmente, e non frontalmente. |
| sent on March 18, 2015 (17:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Naste thanks:-) flashes in fact there were two, the inside of the reflex, and an external (located laterally) in slave controlled by the flash of cameras grazie naste i flash infatti erano due, quello interno della reflex, e uno esterno (posizionato lateralmente) in slave comandato dal flash della reflex |
| sent on March 18, 2015 (18:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Strange, the result should be different, more three-dimensional ... probably the flash side was too far away, or with power equal to or less than the front, sorry if I insist, is why I have tried a few days in the photograph of the eye, and Eventually I managed to save just one shot that came out the way I liked. Strano, il risultato dovrebbe essere diverso, più... tridimensionale, probabilmente il flash laterale era troppo distante, o con potenza uguale o inferiore a quello frontale, scusa se insisto, è perchè mi sono cimentato qualche giorno nella fotografia degli occhi, e alla fine sono riuscito a salvare un solo scatto che è uscito come piaceva a me. |
| sent on March 18, 2015 (21:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
it was about 3 or 4 meters, probably, unlike your profile picture, I was pretty much the front of the objective si era a circa 3 o 4 metri, probabilmente, a differenza della foto del tuo profilo, ero praticamente frontale rispetto all'obiettivo |
| sent on November 30, 2015 (22:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice compliments
bella complimenti
|
| sent on December 02, 2015 (10:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much novice :-) Grazie mille novizio |
| sent on January 23, 2016 (13:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
After a series of tests and various flashate has withered xD Dopo una serie di prove e di flashate varie si è seccato xD |
| sent on October 20, 2018 (14:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good morning I know it's been a while, but having the same goal I wanted to try to do the same thing. Congratulations for the photo is fantastic, but I do not understand it was taken at less than 20cm unless it used extension tubes.. Do you understand? The minimum distance of the Jupiter 9 is about 1MT. Do you confirm the use of the tubes? How many? Remember? Thanks and again congratulations for the photo Buongiorno so che è passato del tempo, ma avendo lo stesso obiettivo volevo provare a fare la stessa cosa. Complimenti per la foto è fantastica, ma non mi risulta sia stata scattata a meno di 20cm a meno che non utilizzasse tubi di prolunga..le risulta?la minima distanza del Jupiter 9 è circa 1mt.Mi conferma l'uso dei tubi? quanti? ricorda? grazie e ancora complimenti per la foto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
15.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
