What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 21, 2014 (10:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'd also like the picture, I find it just a little 'tight and I have doubts on adults.
I am amazed by the choices of f16, although the focus behind seems correct: blurred but understandable.
However, the adult specimen does not seem clear, and I wondered if it was due to the diaphragm, or the maf.
la foto mi piacerebbe anche, la trovo solo un po' stretta e ho dei dubbi sull'adulto.
sono stupito dalla scelte di f16, anche se lo sfuocato dietro sembra corretto: sfuocato ma comprensibile.
tuttavia l'esemplare adulto non mi sembra nitido, e mi chiedevo se era dovuto al diaframma, alla maf o che.
|
| sent on January 21, 2014 (12:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Marcom, very appreciated your comment .... I did a lot of shots to the little family, just because I was trying to have them all on fire ... I could not .... I tried with different diaphragms ... but this is the best result at which I arrived .... Hello. GM Grazie Marcom, molto apprezzato il tuo commento....ho fatto molti scatti alla famigliola, proprio perchè cercavo di averli tutti a fuoco...non ci sono riuscito....ho provato con diaframmi differenti...ma questo è il risultato migliore a cui sono arrivato....Ciao. GM |
| sent on January 21, 2014 (13:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I correct then why did not believe it, but I give evidence ;-): f16 was not enough with the focal length you used. allora rettifico perchè non ci credevo, ma mi arrendo all'evidenza  : f16 non era sufficente con la focale che hai usato. |
| sent on January 21, 2014 (15:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A masterpiece of photos! wow wow! Un capolavoro di foto!!  |
| sent on January 21, 2014 (18:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Marcom: will the doubt .... I shot at 8:13 and got their pictures in which the mother is not in focus ... then, however, since the compromise was acceptable with the times I've closed 16 ... . Hello. GM Marcom: resterà il dubbio....ho scattato a 8 e 13 ed ho ottenuto foto in cui la mamma proprio non è a fuoco...poi, visto che comunque il compromesso con i tempi era accettabile ho chiuso a 16....Ciao. GM |
| sent on January 21, 2014 (18:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Henry: Glad you liked it! Hello. GM Grazie Enrico: contento che ti sia piaciuta! Ciao. GM |
| sent on July 05, 2015 (10:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a beautiful little family! :-) Che bella famigliola! |
| sent on July 15, 2019 (6:02)
Excellent image with beautiful colors and superb details. Nice poses, background and composition.
Regards,
Satish. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
