JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on December 08, 2011 (10:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think you've underestimated the photographic situation x these reasons: Shot-pending -Shake -Maf uncertain and early -Little sharpness and detail Composition-which excluded the reflection -Dev.dell 'exposure overexposed? I tried in your exif data missing ones as ISO 800, focal length 214mm, dev.esp. +0333 And 1/80sec. , I invite you to declare them completely because we make it easy to comment. A free hand as you could emphasize shooting?: -Expanding the frame and including the reflection -Exposing more correctly In a bit-closing the diaphragm -Opting for a maf on the head using one-shot, reading spot exposure, keeping the shutter button halfway, recompose and finally taking -Applying a proper technique to prevent the blur. For example accucciandoti and resting his elbows on his knees 2 / calf ... x know more about lawshere: www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?f=25&t=12967 -If you do not you could to avoid the shake kicked the iso or you used the flash softened. hello and good light, laurel Credo che tu abbia sottostimato la situazione fotografica x questi motivi: -inquadratura pendente -micromosso -maf incerta e anticipata -poca nitidezza e dettaglio -composizione che ha escluso il riflesso -dev.dell'esposizione sovraesposta? Ho cercato nei tuoi dati exif quelli mancanti come iso 800,focale 214mm, dev.esp. +0.333 e 1/80sec. , ti invito a dichiararli completamente perchè ci facilitano il commento . A mano libera come avresti potuto enfatizzare lo scatto?: -allargando l'inquadratura e includendo il riflesso -esponendo più correttamente -chiudendo un pelino il diaframma -optando per una maf sulla testa usando one-shot , lettura esposizione spot, mantenendo il pulsante di scatto a metà corsa, ricomponendo e infine scattando -applicando una corretta tecnica per evitare il micromosso. Ad esempio accucciandoti e appoggiando i 2 gomiti sui ginocchi/polpacci ... x approfondire l'argomento leggi qui: www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?f=25&t=12967 -se proprio non riuscivi ad evitare il micromosso alzavi gli iso o usavi il flash ammorbidito. ciao e buona luce, lauro
sent on December 09, 2011 (9:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks to this post I gave a great help, I noticed many things that could prevent proofread, with this in mind I'm sure that I was free hand perhaps at this juncture I do not remember I was leaning hello thank you very grazie questo commento mi a dato un ottimo aiuto, ho notato tante cose che potevo evitare che correggerò, con questa ottica sono sicuro che ero mano libera forse in questo frangente mi ero appoggiato non ricordo grazie veramente ciao