What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 04, 2014 (9:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Always lovely Lake Orta, maybe lift a little 'black level to counter.
Despite the diaphragm closed the definition is very good, f/16, however, has highlighted the dirt on the sensor.
hello Sempre incantevole il lago d'Orta, forse alzerei un po' il livello del nero per contrastare.
Nonostante il diaframma molto chiuso la definizione è ottima, f/16 ha però messo in evidenza lo sporco sul sensore.
ciao |
| sent on January 04, 2014 (10:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very passage Beppeverge .....
You are right about the dirt on the sensor, I often shutter speeds above the second, although it was made clean.
With automated tests do not detect the reflex abnormalities ever, I hope it is not a problem more 'serious .....
Try 'to follow your advice to the post, unfortunately the light was bad yesterday (I must admit that I struggled to recover stains) .....
Meanwhile, thanks
Greetings
Ti ringrazio molto del passaggio Beppeverge.....
Hai ragione per lo sporco sul sensore, mi capita spesso con tempi di posa sopra il secondo, nonostante sia stata fatta la pulizia.
Con i test automatici della reflex non rilevo mai anomalie, spero non sia un problema piu' grave.....
Provero' a seguire il tuo consiglio per la post, la luce ieri purtroppo era pessima (devo ammettere che ho faticato a recuperare le macchie).....
Intanto grazie
Un saluto
|
| sent on January 04, 2014 (11:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Michael, the dirt on the sensor is highlighted by the diaphragm very closed, with long exposures.
If you want to do the real point of the situation, and to scare you, point the camera toward the sky with any lens and take a picture with any exposure time at f/16 or more closed, you'll see that show. ;-)
hello Michele, lo sporco sul sensore si evidenzia con il diaframma molto chiuso, non con le lunghe esposizioni.
Se vuoi fare il reale punto della situazione, e spaventarti, punta la fotocamera verso il cielo con qualsiasi lente e fai una foto con qualsiasi tempo di esposizione a f/16 o più chiuso, vedrai che spettacolo. 
ciao |
| sent on January 04, 2014 (13:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So this kind of tips for shooting in daylight even open to f11 at the expense of maybe not having everything in focus? Do you think the stains should disappear?
Thanks Quindi consigli per scatti di questo tipo con luce diurna di aprire anche a f11 a scapito magari di non avere tutto a fuoco? Secondo te le macchie dovrebbero sparire?
Grazie |
| sent on January 04, 2014 (15:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Obviously you have to consider closing the aperture based on the scene but a scene like that photo you have everything in focus even with a 300mm f/5.6, I'll tell you why I often go to the MDS to photograph.
If you do, you can always try to stay out of a optimum aperture of f / 8, the value at which the majority of the lens works well, f/16 for a picture like this does not make sense.
At f/2.8 see absolutely no dirt on the sensor, f/5.6 is very difficult to see it, f / 8 you get to see something while in more closures becomes more and more evident. Ovviamente devi valutare la chiusura del diaframma in base alla scena ma per una scena come quella della foto hai tutto a fuoco anche a f/5.6 con un 300mm, te lo dico perchè vado spesso alla MDS a fotografare.
Se ti è possibile cerca sempre do stare su un valore di apertura ottimale di f/8, valore al quale la maggior parte delle lenti lavora bene, f/16 per una foto come questa non ha proprio senso.
A f/2.8 non vedi assolutamente lo sporco sul sensore, a f/5.6 è molto difficile che lo vedi, a f/8 si inizia a vedere qualcosa mentre a maggiori chiusure diventa sempre più evidente. |
| sent on January 04, 2014 (20:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok thank you.
Greetings Ok ti ringrazio.
Un saluto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
