JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on December 22, 2013 (10:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Purely personal opinion. I'd be limited to just photograph the plant by removing the recovery across the clear, a little 'because it is not clear (at least to me) what it represents, and a bit' because it greatly disturbs the view of the subject. Even that object gray salt that it could reduce recovery and the rest eventually clone.
Opinione puramente personale. Mi sarei limitato a fotografare semplicemente la pianta eliminando dalla ripresa tutta la parte chiara, un po' perché non è chiaro (almeno al sottoscritto) ciò che rappresenta, ed un po' perché disturba notevolmente la visuale del soggetto. Anche quell'oggetto grigio che sale lo si poteva ridurre in ripresa ed il resto eventualmente clonarlo.
sent on December 22, 2013 (21:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
inanza all thanks to Lucas and Will for the passage:-D:-D Pigi47 to answer: what I wanted to represent in this picture is the contrast between the colors and the natural living forms of the plant with the cold and ruvio artificial environment that feeds it and keeps it in life, away from the light of the true sun and prying eyes. In short, I wanted to show how from a certain point of view, it may be considered excessive or cruel a law that prohibits the existence of a plant (regardless of whether the law is right or wrong), so compelled to "inaction" and to growth in artificial environments. I definitely suggest that the composition is of great effect (and in fact I had even thought), but I do not think I would be able to express the message I had in mind with that technique (always assuming thatbuckle conveyed something with this picture here) ;-) inanzi tutto grazie a Lucas e Will per il passaggio per rispondere a Pigi47: ciò che ho voluto rappresentare in questa immagine è il contrasto fra le vive cromie e le naturali forme della pianta con il freddo e ruvio ambiente artificiale che la alimenta e la mantiene in vita, lontana dalla luce del vero sole e dagli occhi indiscreti. insomma, ho voluto mostrare come da un certo punto di vista, si possa ritenere esagerata o crudele una legge che vieti l'esistenza stessa di una pianta (indipendentemente dal fatto che la legge sia giusta o meno), costretta così alla "latitanza" e alla crescita in ambienti artificiali. sicuramente la composizione che mi suggerisci è di grande effetto (e in effetti ci avevo anche pensato), tuttavia non credo sarei riuscito a esprimere il messaggio che avevo in mente con quella tecnica (sempre ammettendo che abbia trasmesso qualcosa con questa immagine qua)
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
