What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 28, 2011 (22:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Raffaele, warm light and grazing and also mist are actually pleasant, however the composition does not convince me, and for the horizontal division into three thirds, and the lack of a "subject" more accativante. I do not think razor sharp. Ciao Raffaele, la luce calda e radente e anche la foschia sono effettivamente piacevoli, la compo invece non mi convince, sia per la suddivisione in tre terzi orizzontali, sia per la mancanza di un "soggetto" più accativante. Non mi pare nitidissima. |
| sent on November 28, 2011 (23:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Raffaele!
The picture for me is good, certainly better than the ones you posted on pentaxiani, but like the other lacks sharpness, as you pointed out as well Eliana.
is not that you have some problem with f / b focus? I've had it with the K7 and were not nestable only with AF fine tuning. Ciao Raffaele!
La foto per me è buona, sicuramente meglio di quelle che hai postato su pentaxiani, ma come le altre manca di nitidezza, come ti ha fatto notare pure Eliana.
non è che hai qualche problema di f/b focus? Io con la K7 ne ho avuti e non erano sistemabili solamente con la regolazione fine dell'AF. |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (6:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello ...
shooting is not 'bad ...
the top of the photos I find it a bit 'too much and the foreground out of focus I do not like very much ...
very nice instead of the game plan and the mist ...! Ciao ...
lo scatto non e' male ...
la parte alta della foto la trovo un po' eccessiva e il primo piano sfuocato non mi piace moltissimo ...
molto bello invece il gioco dei piano e la nebbiolina ...!!! |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (8:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello everyone, thanks for the comments, actually the most common remark I get to the first plane of focus (often the point at infinity, but you can definitely do differently and better) and then says Galdor actually have a problem of regulation of 'autofocus that at times I think I've solved but actually it is not always true.
Raffaele Ciao a tutti, grazie dei commenti, effettivamente l'osservazione più ricorrente che ricevo riguarda il primo piano sfuocato (spesso e volentieri punto all'infinito ma si può sicuramente fare diversamente e meglio) e poi come dice Galdor effettivamente ho un problema di regolazione dell'autofocus che in certi momenti credo di aver risolto ma effettivamente non sempre è vero.
Raffaele |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (9:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Raffaele Sorry, you can post the shooting data, lens used, tripod or handheld? Here the f / b focus is not involved. Not 'that you've taken with the focus at infinity and a diaphragm improperly sealed?
In such a case, tripod and hyperfocal, I think you would have saved. Hello.
Maximum Scusa Raffaele, puoi postare i dati di scatto, obiettivo usato, treppiede o mano libera? Qui il f/b focus non c'entra. Non e' che tu hai scattato con la messa a fuoco all'infinito e un diaframma non sufficientemente chiuso?
In un caso come questo, treppiede e iperfocale, secondo me ti avrebbero salvato. Ciao.
Massimo |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (10:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Max57 could be right as well, even in this case I think he's right sull'iperfocale. My judgment is due to other photos you posted on this as well as pentaxiani where I had already commented on the problems of sharpness of almost all the photos too small aperture to f8 or f11. Potrebbe avere ragione pure Max57, anzi in questo caso credo che abbia ragione sull'iperfocale. Il mio giudizio è dovuto ad altre foto che hai postato oltre a questa su pentaxiani dove ti avevo già commentato i problemi di nitidezza su quasi tutte le foto anche a diaframma chiuso a f8 o f11. |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (10:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Optics? Sensor clean? Ottica ? Sensore pulito? |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (13:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, everyone, shooting data, Pentax7, Pentax 18-55 to 18, 1/200, ISO100, tripod, shutter 2s.
For the sensor is easy that is to be cleaned ...
Thanks
Raffaele
Ciao, a tutti, dati di scatto, Pentax7, Pentax 18-55 a 18, 1/200, ISO100, treppiede, scatto a 2s.
Per il sensore è facile che debba provvedere alla pulizia...
Grazie
Raffaele
|
| sent on December 06, 2011 (13:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello I wanted to add that pleased to receive comments (c critical advice).
Raffaele
Ciao volevo aggiungere che fa piacere ricevere commenti (consigli c critiche).
Raffaele
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
