What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 28, 2011 (20:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fully agree on everything you said! ;-)
I've found these "defects" above all, what bothers me the most is the front "burned".
For 2.8 I realized then that the pdc home was too little, but when I was there, the need to set the ISO 1600 annoyed me a lot!
Thank you very much for your comment.
Wood Concordo in pieno su tutto quello che hai detto!
Ho trovato anch'io questi "difetti" soprattutto, quello che mi infastidisce di più è la fronte "bruciata".
Per il 2,8 mi sono accorto poi a casa che la pdc era troppo poca, ma quand'ero là, il dover impostare i 1600 ISO mi scocciava parecchio!
Grazie infinitamente del tuo commento.
Legno |
| sent on November 28, 2011 (20:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello
how they positioned the lights? you used the reflective panels?
Why would seem that as "wattage" were not in a bad way, perhaps a better positioning of the lights you have permission to use a wider aperture adapted without raising the ISO ... but the light patterns leave the ball to the more experienced ... :-D
Anyway assolutmante awarded the idea of ??the shot, I love it ;-) Ciao
come erano posizionate le luci? hai usato dei pannelli riflettenti?
Perchè sembrerebbe che come "wattaggio" non eri messo male, forse un miglior posizionamento delle luci ti avrebbe permesso di usare un diaframma più adeguato senza alzare gli ISO... ma per gli schemi luminosi lascio la palla ai più esperti... 
Cmq assolutmante premiata l'idea dello scatto, mi piace moltissimo |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (8:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
There were two lights continuous 300Watt positioned at 45 degrees to the sides of the model. I did not use any reflector. Unfortunately, the lights were not adjustable and I think the right (towards the face) was too close. Next time I will get more of a commitment to fix them ... But according to you instead of the two lights, I used two flash by ordering two trigger ttl and not putting the same speaker, I had the opportunity to close a couple of stop?
Thanks again
Wood C'erano due luci continue di 300watt posizionate a 45 gradi ai lati della modella. Non ho usato nessun pannello riflettente. Purtroppo le luci non erano regolabili e secondo me quella di destra (verso il viso) era troppo vicina. Per la prossima volta mi metterò più d'impegno a sistemarle... Ma secondo te al posto delle due luci, avessi usato due flash comandandoli da due trigger non ttl e mettendo lo stesso diffusore, avrei avuto la possibilità di chiudere di un paio di stop? 
Grazie ancora
Legno |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (16:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello
Usually the flash are better 'cause equal' power, with fixed lights, the model would roast:-D
I know 'cause it's been a suggestion that it' was given to me ...
Unfortunately the photos are not able to understand the magnitude of the speakers or give precise indications (not 'cause it is not possible but because' not so 'esparto)
Calculate the lights, to me, are the most 'difficult at all. I have so much to learn :-|
Hello
Faith Ciao
Di solito i flash sono meglio perche' a parita' di potenza, con le luci fisse, faresti la modella arrosto
questo lo so perche' e' stato un consiglio che e' stato dato a me...
Purtroppo dalla foto non sono in grado di capire la grandezza dei diffusori o darti indicazioni precise (non perche' non sia possible ma perche' non sono cosi' esparto)
Calcola che le luci, per me, sono la cosa piu' difficile in assoluto. Ho tantissimo da imparare 
Ciao
FeDe |
| sent on May 23, 2013 (16:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with above, but for me it's a nice shot ;-) concordo con sopra,ma per me è un bel scatto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
