What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 23, 2011 (21:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Umito (ap)
canon 60d and sigma 10-20 at f13. 16 seconds at 320 iso (if I remember correctly)
hello all,
Lorenzo umito (ap)
canon 60d e sigma 10-20 a f13. 16 secondi a 320 iso (se ricordo bene)
ciao a tutti,
Lorenzo |
| sent on November 23, 2011 (21:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful rotating water, convinces me less under the aspect sharpness and post production in general bellissima la rotazione dell'acqua, mi convince meno sotto l'aspetto nitidezza e post produzione in generale |
| sent on November 23, 2011 (21:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello, good idea, but not optimal implementation ... I would have kept the rotation more in the foreground and eavrei avoided cutting the "circumference", sharpness unfortunately not optimal. ciao, buona l'idea ma non ottimale la realizzazione... avrei tenuto la rotazione più in primo piano ed eavrei evitato di tagliare la "circonferenza", nitidezza purtroppo non ottimale. |
| sent on November 23, 2011 (21:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks for the comments.
because I really want to learn and are just beginning (this is the first photos I post here) could you tell me what do you see as the lack of clarity and what would you have changed in pp?
thanks again,
Lorenzo grazie dei commenti.
siccome ho molta voglia di imparare e sono solo all'inizio (questa è la prima foto che posto qui) potreste dirmi da cosa si vede la scarsa nitidezza e cosa avreste cambiato nella pp?
grazie ancora,
Lorenzo |
user1338 | sent on November 23, 2011 (23:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A picture really original, nice the effect of water, congratulations.
Hello. Una foto davvero originale, bello l'effetto dell'acqua, complimenti.
Ciao. |
| sent on November 23, 2011 (23:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would have concentrated on the effect of water on the detail io mi sarei concentrato sull'effetto dell'acqua,sul dettaglio |
| sent on November 24, 2011 (6:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful effect of the water ...
I do not exalt the very top of the thrills but then that was the location ...! Bello l'effetto dell'acqua ...
non mi esalta molto la parte alta del freme ma del resto quella era la location ...!!! |
| sent on November 24, 2011 (10:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
One question ... but did you use a GND filter?
It 'a fusion of the same raw?
I do not understand how with 16 seconds of exposure not gone away the details of the illuminated side of the mountain and a large part of the sky? Una domanda...ma hai usato un filtro GND ??
E' una fusione dello stesso raw ?
Non capisco come con 16 secondi di esposizione non se ne siano andati i dettagli della parte illuminata della montagna e di buona parte del cielo ?? |
| sent on November 24, 2011 (10:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
you have used a gnd ...... si ho usato un gnd...... |
| sent on November 24, 2011 (11:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the clarification, I would say good result so good .... a solution often underestimated. Grazie per il chiarimento, direi buon risultato quindi, bravo....una soluzione spesso sottovalutata. |
| sent on November 24, 2011 (11:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful photos and great dynamism '! good ...! bellissima foto e gran dinamicita'!!! bravo...! |
| sent on November 24, 2011 (13:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
BEAUTIFUL PICTURE, EVEN IF THE ROTATION THAT SHOULD BE THE UNLIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND 'put aside and cropped, The I WOULD SEAL THE CENTER AND MAYBE I WOULD NOT HAVE AN OFFICIAL OF THE STONE THAT SX averts his SGUARDA. I DO NOT CONVINCING A LOT THAT FILLS THE SKY TOO SCENE AND THE BACKGROUND IS 'VERY ATTRACTIVE, MAYBE I WOULD HAVE TAKEN MORE' SHOT IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRIP THAT IS MOST 'INTERESTING. PP I WOULD HAVE INCREASED BUT LEAVES CANTRASTO Nonn TOO ..... CMQ I FIND THE TIME AND THE PERSON VERY INTERESTING AND WELL-CHOSEN ;-) BELLA FOTO, ANCHE SE LA ROTAZIONE CHE DOVREBBE ESSERE IL SOGETTO E' MESSA IN DISPARTE E RITAGLIATA; L'AVREI TENUTA AL CENTRO E NON AVREI MAGARI INQUADRATO IL SASSO DI SX CHE DISTOGLIE LO SGUARDA. NON MI CONVINCE MOLTISSIMO IL CIELO CHE OCCUPA TROPPA SCENA E LO SFONDO NON E' MOLTO ATTRAENTE, FORSE AVREI PRESO PIU' INQUADRATURA NELLA PARTE BASSA DELLO SCATTO CHE SEMBRA PIU' INTERESSANTE. IN PP AVREI AUMENTATO IL CANTRASTO DELLE FOGLIE MA NONN TROPPO..... TROVO CMQ I TEMPI E IL SOGGETTO MOLTO INTERESSANTI E BEN SCELTI |
| sent on November 24, 2011 (13:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks for the comment pierniteo! I have other shots taken with the rotation "in full" but I prefer this as a composition in which the vortex is a little off-center. the stone left I have deliberately added to give a little more depth to the image and I have not too tight framing not to cut too much reflection tree water. in a nutshell: to focus more on the vortex would "sopgliato" too and the composition would accentuatao troppp the dark and bulky mass of the rock station.
I would like to insert a version where I tried to increase the sharpness but I do not know how to post the picture in this post ....
grazie del commento pierniteo! ho anche altri scatti con la rotazione presa "per intero" però come composizione preferisco questo in cui il vortice è un pò decentrato. il sasso a sx l'ho inserito volutamente per dare un pò più di profondità all'immagine e non ho stretto troppo l'inquadratura per non tagliare troppo il riflesso dell'albero sull'acqua. in poche parole: concentrami di più sul vortice avrebbe "sopgliato" troppo la composizione e avrebbe accentuatao troppp la massa buia ed ingombrante del masso centrale.
vorrei inserire una versione in cui ho cercato di aumentare la nitidezza ma non so come si sa a postare la foto in questo messaggio....
|
| sent on November 24, 2011 (18:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bella!, How much I love this kind of photos you do not need me to say it ;-) the vortex is very nice and the composition with the leaves still on top I like, but you also recover more from mica ' high?
Hello.
Ps to insert a second version you can load it into [URL =] imageshack.us/ and insert the link that you ;-) Bella!, quanto mi piacciono questo tipo di foto non c'è bisogno che lo dica il vortice è molto bello ed anche la composizione con le foglie ferme in primo piano mi piace, ma ne hai mica anche una ripresa più dall'alto ?
Ciao.
Ps per inserirne una seconda versione puoi caricarla inhttp://imageshack.us/ ed inserire il link che ti danno |
| sent on November 24, 2011 (19:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks for the comment and information technology, Catherine!
I have actually taken another higher and vertically I want to develop in the next few days ...... thanks again for the visit, your compliments make me very happy! grazie del commento e dell'informazione tecnica, Caterina!!
ne ho in effetti un'altra scattata più in alto ed in verticale che voglio elaborare nei prossimi giorni......grazie ancora della visita, i tuoi complimenti mi fanno molto piacere! |
| sent on November 24, 2011 (22:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A picture, in my opinion, well made and I agree with you on the choice of the composition. Una foto, a mio parere, ben fatta e concordo con te sulla scelta della composizione. |
| sent on February 01, 2013 (6:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations, great shot Complimenti, ottimo scatto |
user62173 | sent on June 28, 2015 (21:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gorgeous. ;-)
I wish I had taken I though my composition would have been different.
What strikes me is the water ... which seems keen to wet if you stretch your hand. Bellissima.
Vorrei averla scattata io anche se la mia composizione sarebbe stata diversa.
Quello che mi colpisce è l'acqua...che sembra poterti bagnare se allunghi la mano. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
