The Beech forest in autumn

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

16.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Boschi View gallery (22 photos)

The Beech forest in autumn sent on November 10, 2013 (19:19) by Sergio Cecchini. 9 comments, 2923 views.

, 1/60 f/8.0, ISO 100, tripod. Faggeta dei Monti Cimini, Italy.

View High Resolution 16.0 MP

24 persons like it: 1niko, Alcenero, Boccio Mura, Elena Guenza, Emozionevisiva, Fabio F77, Franco Buffalmano, Gpierocompostela, Ivan53, Leoconte, Liliana, Luciano54, MatteoB, Maurizio Bistacchia, Maxlaz66, Michele Poma, Netttto23, Nicholas N.h., Osvaldomorelli, Pedrorusch, Roberto1977, Stefano Masala, Swagger, Vasile Gori

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

user24002

sent on November 10, 2013 (21:21)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Bellissima la tridimensionalita' di questa foto! le ottiche Zeiss non scherzano ;-)

Beautiful dimensionality 'of this photo! Zeiss lenses are not joking ;-)

Sergio Cecchini

sent on November 11, 2013 (8:56)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Si l'85 poi non scherza, prima o poi vorrei però provarlo su FX.
Ciao e grazie
S

85 It is not joking then, sooner or later, but I would try it on FX.
Hello and thank you
S

1niko

sent on December 25, 2013 (18:31)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Ottimi colori,ottima luce,ottimo obiettivo. ;-)

Nicolò

Great colors, great light, great goal. ;-) Nicolo

Sergio Cecchini

sent on December 25, 2013 (18:45)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Grazie Nicolò
S

Thanks Nicholas
S

Maxlaz66

sent on March 12, 2014 (11:25)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Sergio, dove finisce il sensore sony e dove iniziail vetro Zeiss ? Ovvero, il 18-55 in bundle, è veramente tragico o accettabile ?

Sergio, where it ends and where the sensor sony iniziail Zeiss glass? That is, the bundled 18-55, it really is tragic or acceptable?

Sergio Cecchini

sent on March 12, 2014 (14:08)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Non so del 18-55 (da confronti sul web ne uscirebbe meglio del 16-50), comunque essendo possessore di quest'ultimo posso dirti che non è da disprezzare nel rapporto costo/qualità.
Certamente preferisco lo Zeiss, sopratutto sui fissi, e considera che ho acquistato la Nex proprio per poterli riutilizzare e non lasciarli ancora chiusi in un cassetto.
Personalmente fotografando non ritengo decisivi (magari sbagliando) gamma dinamica, distorsione (non esagerata) ecc. .
Comunque di seguito alcune immagini con il 16-50: www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=55863&l=it
Ciao
S

I do not know of 18-55 (by comparison on the web would come out better than 16-50), however the latter being the owner I can tell you that it is not to be despised in the cost / quality ratio.
Of course I prefer the Zeiss, especially on fixed, and considering that I bought the Nex for reuse and not just leave them still locked in a drawer.
Personally I do not consider photographing decisive (perhaps wrongly) dynamic range, distortion (not overdone) and so on. .
However, here are some pictures with the 16-50: www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=55863&l=it
Hello
S

Maxlaz66

sent on March 12, 2014 (15:34)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Beh, beh, beh... male non sembrano...
grazie
ciao
Max

Well, well, well ... evil does not seem ...
thanks
hello
Max

Alcenero

sent on December 16, 2019 (0:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Image of great beauty, excellent chromatic that compositively
Many compliments

Sergio Cecchini

sent on February 05, 2020 (8:40) | This comment has been translated

Cool

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.