What do you think about this photo?
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a
photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto.
With more than 258000members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user24002
|
sent on 10 Novembre 2013 (21:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful dimensionality 'of this photo! Zeiss lenses are not joking ;-) Bellissima la tridimensionalita' di questa foto! le ottiche Zeiss non scherzano |
|
|
sent on 11 Novembre 2013 (8:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
85 It is not joking then, sooner or later, but I would try it on FX.
Hello and thank you
S Si l'85 poi non scherza, prima o poi vorrei però provarlo su FX.
Ciao e grazie
S |
|
|
sent on 25 Dicembre 2013 (18:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great colors, great light, great goal. ;-) Nicolo Ottimi colori,ottima luce,ottimo obiettivo.Nicolò |
|
|
sent on 25 Dicembre 2013 (18:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Nicholas
S Grazie Nicolò
S |
|
|
sent on 12 Marzo 2014 (11:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sergio, where it ends and where the sensor sony iniziail Zeiss glass? That is, the bundled 18-55, it really is tragic or acceptable? Sergio, dove finisce il sensore sony e dove iniziail vetro Zeiss ? Ovvero, il 18-55 in bundle, è veramente tragico o accettabile ? |
|
|
sent on 12 Marzo 2014 (14:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not know of 18-55 (by comparison on the web would come out better than 16-50), however the latter being the owner I can tell you that it is not to be despised in the cost / quality ratio.
Of course I prefer the Zeiss, especially on fixed, and considering that I bought the Nex for reuse and not just leave them still locked in a drawer.
Personally I do not consider photographing decisive (perhaps wrongly) dynamic range, distortion (not overdone) and so on. .
However, here are some pictures with the 16-50: www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=55863&l=it
Hello
S Non so del 18-55 (da confronti sul web ne uscirebbe meglio del 16-50), comunque essendo possessore di quest'ultimo posso dirti che non è da disprezzare nel rapporto costo/qualità.
Certamente preferisco lo Zeiss, sopratutto sui fissi, e considera che ho acquistato la Nex proprio per poterli riutilizzare e non lasciarli ancora chiusi in un cassetto.
Personalmente fotografando non ritengo decisivi (magari sbagliando) gamma dinamica, distorsione (non esagerata) ecc. .
Comunque di seguito alcune immagini con il 16-50: www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=55863&l=it
Ciao
S |
|
|
sent on 12 Marzo 2014 (15:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well, well, well ... evil does not seem ...
thanks
hello
Max Beh, beh, beh... male non sembrano...
grazie
ciao
Max |
|
|
sent on 16 Dicembre 2019 (0:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Image of great beauty, excellent chromatic that compositively
Many compliments Immagine di grande bellezza, ottimo cromaticamente che compositivamente
Tanti complimenti |
|
|
sent on 05 Febbraio 2020 (8:40) | This comment has been translated
 |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
16.0 MEGAPIXEL
