JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 28, 2013 (14:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's not easy to take a subject flight and maybe you advance a moment the fire is not it? The shot I do not mind. In pp I would try to remove the triangle of concrete approaches to the subject, a little bit disturbing. Hello Non è facile riprendere un soggetto al volo e forse hai anticipato di un attimo il fuoco o sbaglio? L'inquadratura non mi dispiace. In pp proverei a togliere il triangolo di cemento che si avvicina al soggetto, disturbando un pochettino. Ciao
sent on October 28, 2013 (19:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not usually like to remove elements that exist naturally in the frame. In the particular case then the triangle of cement, in my opinion, by accentuating the effect of depth to the image obtained with a flattened perspective next to the 500mm focal length (focal length multiplier + + magnification factor sensor). With regard to the fire do not put my hand in the fire that it is in fact perfectly in focus but I seem to have been quite lucky because the wings are blurred because of motion and the muzzle is well defined and oriented towards the point of recovery! non mi piace in genere togliere elementi che esistono naturalmente nell'inquadratura. Nel caso particolare poi il triangolo di cemento, a mio parere, da profondità all'immagine accentuando l'effetto prospettiva schiacciata ottenuto con una focale prossima ai 500mm (focale + moltiplicatore + fattore d'ingrandimento sensore). Riguardo al fuoco non ci metterei la mano sul fuoco che sia appunto perfettamente a fuoco ma mi sembra di essere stato abbastanza fortunato perché le ali sono sfuocate per via del movimento e il muso è ben delineato ed orientato verso il punto di ripresa!
sent on November 05, 2013 (14:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Ciross, cement behind by a continuity with the prospect and the three-dimensionality of the picture. I guess it is not easy to make these shots, with the focus then even less. concordo con Ciross, il cemento dietro da una continuità alla prospettiva e alla tridimensionalità della foto. immagino non sia facile fare questi scatti, con quella focale poi ancora meno.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
