What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 17, 2013 (0:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A show! Congratulations! Uno spettacolo ! Complimenti! |
| sent on January 22, 2014 (0:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice composition, maf, sharpness and colors. I would try to lighten the nose in a bit. (IMHO). hello, laurel Piacevoli la composizione, la maf, la nitidezza e i colori. Proverei a schiarire un pelino il musetto. (imho) . ciao, lauro |
| sent on January 22, 2014 (0:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you. I tried, but shooting at high ISO with D300s, especially in shaded areas the noise gets a lot. Eventually I gave up. Grazie. Ci ho provato, ma scattando a ISO elevati con la D300s, soprattutto nelle zone in ombra il rumore si alza di parecchio. Alla fine ho desistito. |
| sent on January 22, 2014 (0:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I had felt the slight digital noise on the nose but not obscuring the exif data and placing them in the appropriate fields Compleat I lacked confirmation.
In these cases, would agree always overexpose by 1/3 or 2/3 stop and then underexpose in pp or use D-Lighting or (as I understand) to spend on a camera more powerful as ISO and dynamic range ;-)
(Imho)
hello, laurel L'avevo percepito dal leggero rumore digitale sul musetto ma oscurando i dati exif e non inserendoli compleatamente negli appositi campi mi mancava la conferma.
In questi casi converrebbe sempre sovraesporre di 1/3 o 2/3 di stop e poi sottoesporre in p.p. o usare il D-LIghting o (da come ho capito) passare su una reflex più performante come iso e gamma dinamica 
(imho)
ciao, lauro |
| sent on January 22, 2014 (1:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is, in fact, the major limitation of the D300s was held at high ISO. I checked, they were not so high (800) but probably (as you rightly suggested) the picture was slightly underexposed (at least for the shaded areas).
In these situations, the ability to recover the shadows of the D800 is unbeatable.
Hello,
Stefano Si, in effetti il limite maggiore della D300s era la tenuta agli alti ISO. Ho controllato, non erano poi così alti (800) ma probabilmente (come hai giustamente suggerito) la foto era leggermente sottoesposta (almeno per le zone in ombra).
In queste situazioni, la capacità di recupero ombre della D800 è imbattibile.
Ciao,
Stefano |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
